Trey W.
Hall-of-Famer
Online
Everyone loves the promise of young, new talent coming to their favorite team. However, with the way the transfer portal has developed is recruiting as necessary as it used to be?
First off, star ratings are judgmental given how different sports entities rate the same players. ESPN could have a player a high 5 star while another has them as a 4 star. Plus, does that player fit into the college team’s scheme and strengths.
Secondly, how stacked is the team at that position. With the entitlement this generation feels they deserve and the me first attitudes, is that player willing to wait his turn if he doesn’t win the starting spot in camp as a freshman? Is the player willing to change positions to get playing time or to benefit the needs of the team over their own?
The transfer portal, IMO has made recruiting less necessary. While it’s still important to try and get players in, we have seen it now since the rule changes, players don’t stick around long. Even players that were starters for really good teams jump ship. Alabama, Ohio St, and other top teams all had starters leave for other schools. I can understand the Bama players because of Saban retiring and not know what the new HC brings. I don’t know if it is because of NIL or what reasons but there is no more loyalty from players any more.
Teams can now pick and choose players that have playing time on the college level, that have showed abilities over a freshman coming out of high school that may take time to develop and train.
I’m not saying the portal is bad, LSU has benefited greatly from it. However, I do feel there need to be serious changes like how long it is open, how long a player should stay at a school before being able to enter, how many times they can enter, etc.
Just curious what everyone’s thoughts are on recruiting and the portal usage. With all the talk of signing day, how teams rank, and future classes, just thought it would be something different to talk about.
First off, star ratings are judgmental given how different sports entities rate the same players. ESPN could have a player a high 5 star while another has them as a 4 star. Plus, does that player fit into the college team’s scheme and strengths.
Secondly, how stacked is the team at that position. With the entitlement this generation feels they deserve and the me first attitudes, is that player willing to wait his turn if he doesn’t win the starting spot in camp as a freshman? Is the player willing to change positions to get playing time or to benefit the needs of the team over their own?
The transfer portal, IMO has made recruiting less necessary. While it’s still important to try and get players in, we have seen it now since the rule changes, players don’t stick around long. Even players that were starters for really good teams jump ship. Alabama, Ohio St, and other top teams all had starters leave for other schools. I can understand the Bama players because of Saban retiring and not know what the new HC brings. I don’t know if it is because of NIL or what reasons but there is no more loyalty from players any more.
Teams can now pick and choose players that have playing time on the college level, that have showed abilities over a freshman coming out of high school that may take time to develop and train.
I’m not saying the portal is bad, LSU has benefited greatly from it. However, I do feel there need to be serious changes like how long it is open, how long a player should stay at a school before being able to enter, how many times they can enter, etc.
Just curious what everyone’s thoughts are on recruiting and the portal usage. With all the talk of signing day, how teams rank, and future classes, just thought it would be something different to talk about.