Offline
Not a bad list and I think I agreeMy criteria for sports
1) Do physical attributes such as strength / endurance / agility / hand-eye coordination etc. come in to play?
2) Do these physical attributes, along with individual or team skill, primarily determine the winner, or are there other factors involved?
3) Are there objective criteria for scoring, or is it partly subjective (i.e. judges ) ?
Board and card games, such as chess and poker, only fufill the last criteria. Therefore they are not sports.
Figure skating fulfills 2 out of 3, but fails on the last criteria. Although figure skaters are athletes, figure skating is not a sport.
NASCAR along with most auto racing, fulfills 2 out of 3 criteria, but fails the second criteria because there are variations between the cars, which affect the outcome of the race to a significant degree. Yes the drivers are athletes, but most auto racing is not a sport. It would be a sport, if all the cars were the same and the winner was determined solely by the drivers skill (and maybe some luck). I think NASCAR or some other racing association tried this once, but apparently the races were "boring" so they went back to the driving teams being able to custom engineer the cars, at least within certain parameters
Bowling and darts fulfill all three, therefore bowling and darts are sports. But the participants aren't athletes, at least not because they bowl or play darts.
Some e-sports would fulfill all three, as long as the rules are the same for all participants, and winning does not rely on knowledge which is secret/not pubic and known ahead of time, such as knowledge of maps, weaknesses in certain characters, etc.
My only hiccup is with ‘judges’
Can you draw a sharp distinction between judges and referees?