Match Up Can Anderson play fullback? (1 Viewer)

sfbaysaint

ALL-MADDEN TEAM
Joined
Oct 26, 2010
Messages
4,696
Reaction score
3,462
Offline
Looking at Rams offense from week 15 onwards, they have played 75% of snaps in 11 formation (1 RB, 1 TE, 3 WR). Saints have played 52% with that formation.
However, Rams have played just 1% of snaps with 2 RBs ... while saints have played 21% of snaps with 2 RBs in the play.

So there is hardly any tape for 2 RB lineup for the Rams... With all the trickeration they do at the LOS, I will not be surprised that McVay shows some 2 RB lineups.
 
Rams play 95% of their snaps in 11 personnel (1 RB, 1 TE).. Which is an outrageously high number.

They don't use a fullback at all on regular rushing downs (everything but short yardage).

Absolutely no way they can change their base offensive philosophy in one week.
 
Rams play 95% of their snaps in 11 personnel (1 RB, 1 TE).. Which is an outrageously high number.

They don't use a fullback at all on regular rushing downs (everything but short yardage).

Absolutely no way they can change their base offensive philosophy in one week.
I'd like to see them try though. Imagine the false starts, illegal formations, wrong routes being run...

Keystone cops with horns on their uniforms. Lol
 
Rams play 95% of their snaps in 11 personnel (1 RB, 1 TE).. Which is an outrageously high number.

They don't use a fullback at all on regular rushing downs (everything but short yardage).

Absolutely no way they can change their base offensive philosophy in one week.

Right for the full season the 11 personnel snaps is in 90s... my numbers are from week 15 - dallas game, when CJ Anderson was in the lineup.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom