bornnraisedwhodat
More than 15K posts served!
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2009
- Messages
- 26,094
- Reaction score
- 26,879
Offline
I think what Brees said is he won't sign the contract that comes with the franchise tag.
The was per PFT per "a source with knowledge.."
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think what Brees said is he won't sign the contract that comes with the franchise tag.
Nicks being back is just as important as Brees. Pretty sure the FO and coaching staff understands this as well.
we have a transition tag also that would give us the right to refusal of any contracts that are offered Nicks. That is what will most likely be used on him. It works like restricted free agency except there is no compensation if we refuse to match - and we can't use it again until the next year. If we agree then Nicks would sign with the Saints for the same terms offered by the other team.
As for the franchise tag, Drew is saying he does not want to just play next year out under a 1 year contract. We would still keep rights to him if he does not sign it. It would work kind of like the transition tag at that point I think.
Best case scenario..
- Lock up Brees with a nice deal that's cap savvy
- Franchise Tag Nicks
- Re-sign Colston to a fair deal
in that situation Meachem is most likely to walk though. I'll take that trade off though. Joe Morgan can step right into his explosive down the field position.
Maybe Pierre Thomas if you guys are happy with Mark Ingram's progression.Ok so maybe the more important question is, who do we have on our team currently under contract that would be able to willingly re-structure.. So we can fit the deals of Brees, Nicks, Colston all under next years' cap?
Or who can we cut to save cap space?