Shawn
SR is my life!
- Joined
- Jul 9, 1998
- Messages
- 13,504
- Reaction score
- 3,603
- Age
- 59
Offline
I am fond of his judicial appointments, I believe the tax cuts helped stave off the young recession he inheritied from the clinton era, and it also helped with the economic struggles post 9-11,
even people who are against the Iraq war feel the Afganistan conflicts were good, they destablized Bin Laden's organization and overall ability to make war.
He also made efforts to do other good things but was completely railroaded by the Dems and the media. For example Social Security reform,
I am sorry but allowing people to invest 1/4 of thier social security privately as they see fit is not "taking away old peoples social security " as the dems tried to demonize it.
The voucher programs for education I though was a good idea to make education better..
Just as people who feel george bush can do no wrong are simply partisan bush lovers,
The Montra that W did nothing right is an equally partisan POV.
its almost never plain black and white.
He was derailed, because now anyone from any party is allowed to play the victim card.
He was derailed because he drew a line in the sand, and ultimately wasn't able to build any kind of consensus. It's poor leadership. Reagan was as partisan as they come, but he didn't draw a line in the sand about everything. He knew when to hold a gun to people's heads, and when to invite the enemy into his tent for counsel. Consequently, when he did draw a line in the sand, it meant something.
Of course Bush did some things right. You can say that about any President, even Grant or Taft.
But he did so many things wrong, that no amount of success in Iraq will ever redeem his legacy to the extent that he's considered a great President.
Last edited: