How was this not at TD? (1 Viewer)

[dvdman]

file:///var/mobile/Library/SMS/Attachments/42/02/5CE3AFF0-CB7B-47D8-A15B-56314386C14C/IMG_4665.heic

How was this not a TD?

 

[Nolan]

Video did not upload.

 

[ShortFuzed9]

file:///var/mobile/Library/SMS/Attachments/42/02/5CE3AFF0-CB7B-47D8-A15B-56314386C14C/IMG_4665.heic

How was this not a TD?

After reviewing the play the video is inconclusive call on the field stands

 

[HouseCall]

After reviewing the play the video is inconclusive call on the field stands

I’m going to assume (without the video) that it was the “out of bounds in the end zone” catch.

My question is this - how was the video evidence inconclusive to overturn the call - but the fumble recovery on the opening kickoff was conclusive enough to overturn and you couldn’t see the ball at all?

Consistency. We don’t want perfection as fans - we want consistency.

 

[guidomerkinsrules]

I’m going to assume (without the video) that it was the “out of bounds in the end zone” catch.

My question is this - how was the video evidence inconclusive to overturn the call - but the fumble recovery on the opening kickoff was conclusive enough to overturn and you couldn’t see the ball at all?

Consistency. We don’t want perfection as fans - we want consistency.

Yeah that was my question- I was in and out not watching every angle- but it sure seemed like the moment he gained control, his back was completely blocking the ball and we didn’t see the ball again until he was out of bounds
98% sure he had the ball, but that’s an inference - nothing definitive from video

 

[dvdman]

I’m going to assume (without the video) that it was the “out of bounds in the end zone” catch.

My question is this - how was the video evidence inconclusive to overturn the call - but the fumble recovery on the opening kickoff was conclusive enough to overturn and you couldn’t see the ball at all?

Consistency. We don’t want perfection as fans - we want consistency.

Yes you are correct that is the picture I was trying to post along with my comment.

 

[ShortFuzed9]

I’m going to assume (without the video) that it was the “out of bounds in the end zone” catch.

My question is this - how was the video evidence inconclusive to overturn the call - but the fumble recovery on the opening kickoff was conclusive enough to overturn and you couldn’t see the ball at all?

Consistency. We don’t want perfection as fans - we want consistency.

1 knee is worth 2 feet but he was sliding out of bounds its as bang bang as you can get, the fumble was a live ball acquired before going out of bounds . I personally would have called a TD in realtime based on that 1 knee is 2 feet rule the refs got it right on those bit missed the Olave PI