- Joined
- Aug 23, 1997
- Messages
- 1,867
- Reaction score
- 286
- Age
- 76
Offline
Don't forget,... in no way am I challenging anyone's loyalty to the Saints.
My options moving forward are mine, as is my beliefs.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't forget,... in no way am I challenging anyone's loyalty to the Saints.
My options moving forward are mine, as is my beliefs.
Don't forget,... in no way am I challenging anyone's loyalty to the Saints. Nor do I believe that the decision to walk away would be easy for anyone. But I do believe that those who are convinced that there is fixing and/or favoritism in NFL games will continuously be renewed in their conviction after each & every bad call from now to the end of the league.
A person will either have to believe they can trust the games to be legitimate or they have to assume that every outcome was possibly due to favoritism by someone who has the power to control such things. And if a person continues to watch games that they believe are fixed, then this would infer that they are somehow entertained by fake sporting events. I mean, can a person watch a game and conclude that it was a legitimate game only because they did not see any questionable calls? What about the remaining games on that team's schedule? Can you accept the 'well officiated games' and throw out the ones that looked like there was favorable calls for the other team?
I don't know how someone can be a fan of any football team if they conclude that some games may not be legit. But since this is an issue that each person will have to resolve in their own mind, I just hope that the negative or questionable thoughts do not keep spilling over onto the Super Saints Forum from people who never believed in their own mind that they were going to be watching a fair product. How would that be comfortable to those who want to believe that they can trust the games are decided fairly? And how can the Who Dat! Nation stay intact if we have this huge difference of opinions about what's real and what is fake?
I don't see how it can be both ways with anyone. It's either legit, or it's not. Each person must decide for him/her self.
Eggggggzactly. Why is he going so far as to lie about talking to Saints players after the game, orchestrating his press conference to disallow questions about that game except for the one he designated to his bountygate lapdog, Jeff Duncan. No other questions would have been asked if other national reporters didn't abandon their questions to ask follow up questions about the biggest no call in NFL history. Why didn't he release any statement whatsoever about the call, even after not allowing the questions to be asked that everyone wants answered?However, I believe those officials are the best available and decided to ignore the obvious for a reason and the most likely reason is Goodell, considering his behavior since the incident.
Hey... I absolutely respect your decision. And the fact that you will not allow yourself to be a hypocrite is worthy of imitation. As I mentioned, we all have to choose between two options. Trust that it's real and continue to follow and support the league... or believe it's just a big manipulated sham and wave adios to the farce that it is.
If someone tries to fall somewhere in the middle, they are merely fans of the WWE.
People must be true to themselves about what they really believe.
I've never watched wrestling. I do not think it is all that difficult to recognize it as a phony exhibition. But if someone is entertained by fake fights and rowdiness inside & outside the ring, then have at it!
But football is my game. I've never seen it as being perfect either by the way it's played or by the way it is officiated. While not wishing to give any credence to Roger Badell, I have always been able to write off even major officiating blunders as being the common imperfections that are part of an imperfect human activity.
Despite the gravity of this particular blunder, I can reasonably accept that this egregious non-call was the result of a 'perfect storm' of events. Not the least of these was the assembling of a 'dream team' of referees to officiate the games. I know that personally I have been put in situations in my past where I was intimidated to question someone else's judgment about something.
I fully believe that Mr Cavaletto should have seen & called the infractions that took place next to him just as adamantly as he refused to accept that these things actually took place. Is there reasons to question his call and his motives? ABSOLUTELY! But I can also accept some distinct possibilities that went into his erroneous decision.
One is that I truly believe the officials went into that game trying their level best not to 'over-flag' the game. Part of the proof for my reasoning is how many opportunities that were noted by both fan bases where infractions could/should have been appropriate to be flagged. Both the Saints and the Rams escaped having these questionable penalties enforced throughout the game. Had there been a mandate to show favorable bias toward the Rams, we would have seen more of these 'no-calls' enforced against the Saints... when in fact the Rams were actually the more penalized team in that game.
But probably the bigger issue of the two was the physical position of Mr Cavaletto as the pass from Drew approached the players & infractions in front of him. While Mt Turner (Ref #13) would have been in a MUCH better position to see the timing of the hit to TLL in relation to the arrival of the football, Mr Cavaletto did not have that same advantage. Being essentially behind Lewis, his concern about the question of timing would have been much easier to arrive at a judgment of "Bang-Bang" than should have those watching from the side angles.
But from his position, not only would he have been at a disadvantage to note that critical timing of the impact, it may also have been less likely that he would have seen whether it was Robey-Coleman's hands or head that first contacted Lewis. Trying to couple his immediate thoughts about these split second events with the forethought that they were all trying to avoid any/all unnecessary penalties for the whole of the game, this is what I believe led him to make the unwavering judgment that he did.
Of course it only adds to the suspicion that the officials with the good side angles did not try to over-rule his judgment. Though Cavaletto was obviously dead wrong in his call, I actually hold the other two officials MORE at fault for not explaining what they saw rather than allow his initial call to stand. But I believe that much of that issue could be explained by what I mentioned earlier in this overly worded post.
They simply didn't want to make any calls that they didn't HAVE to make in the game. When Cavaletto came over to Turner and said "Bang-Bang", this I believe is why Turner repeated what he said and mouthed the same phrase. "Bang-Bang" right after him. (It was very easy to read his lips even though there was no outside mic that picked up the conversation.)
Turner was quick to allow another Top Rated and Hand Selected official take the responsibility for that decision. Despite having the best position to make the correct call, no one can say for sure where his eyes were focused in those quickly unfolding seconds, and thus he may have been glad to have the other guy be so quick and adamant about his decision. We'll never know for sure what he saw or thought. But the idea is certainly plausible.
So when you take all these possibilities together, it becomes a bit easier for me to see how this could have fallen into the category of being just a horrible call rather than some pre-planned decision to give the Rams the game.
Was Cavaletto's final decision somewhat based on having a greater interest in the Rams over the Saints? Quite possibly. Did his decision keep the Rams hopes alive? Most DEFINITELY! But were those three officials trying to avoid deciding that game at that moment by not pulling out flags for an infraction that they might ordinarily have called in any other game situation? I truly believe that an affirmative answer to this last question is what is the closest thing to the truth.
Yes, the call was wrong. Yes, the Saints got the short end of the stick (again). But I have already concluded to myself that the above issues are what actually happened at the most critical moment of football in Saints history. And because I have come to that conclusion, I believe I will be able to watch future Saints games with the trust that their ability to reach future SuperBowl games will be largely due to the quality of their performance for 18 games for every season that the NFL remains in existence.
If I was not able to convince myself of these things... I would already have shown myself to the door.
Yes, we are all real and we genuinely love our team.Bill,
I’ve always respected you and your takes and this is another take I respect even while I disagree with it.
Sorry I don’t have it in me to type out a very long response, but I just don’t.
Take care Bill and have a great weekend my Who Dat friend. While I fully believe the league is rigged and fake, the Who Dat nation is real. And the bond is strong.
Yes, we are all real and we genuinely love our team.
But some will forever feel differently about what is real on the football field and they will never be able to feel the same way about WINS or LOSSES.
And that saddens me greatly.