N/S Insiders Jordan Schultz & Ian Rapoport have verbal altercation at Indy Starbucks (21 Viewers)

Don't you think it's unethical and tad bit immoral and very hypocritical.to try and quietly and clandestinely ruin or sully another man's relationship and he finds out, well, honestly I think he has a right to call you out and question your integrity.

If what Rappaport truly did what Shultz is accusing him of, I completely sympathize with his reactions because their justified or understandable.
You like that…. “GUY”…. Just sayin’ 🍤
 
Just now seeing this. Accosting someone IN PUBLIC is a bad move, no matter what might have/might not have been said.
Accost, call out. Don’t see why that’s a bad move in public. You don’t like how something’s done, say something. Either way he told him he’d have a problem not punch him in the face.
 
I refrained from commenting on most media "personality" posts but can't resist this one....

I've always believed when the media "personality" is the story it's about as far from sports journalism as you can get, it's about acting and attention.....and it's sad and another reason why there are so few real sports journalists/analysts worth listening to.....
 
Adding context of what Shultz is actually mad about from the article, but even this version is leaving out some key details.

"The catalyst, by all appearances, was Schultz’s Wednesday report that Rams quarterback Matthew Stafford recently met with Raiders minority owner Tom Brady in Montana. Rapoport downplayed the report as a chance, unplanned meeting. Schultz dismissed the notion that it was a random encounter between Brady and Rapoport."

So basically Shultz reported that Tom and Matt met with an implication that it was a planned meeting for Tom to recruit Matt to the Raiders. Ian was asked about it and said that wasn't true - it was just a random chance meeting. Who knows what actually happened, but either way it's two reporters doing their jobs.

Shultz got in his feelings about it and confronted Ian this morning - to which Ian refused to engage. Then security got involved because Shultz made a threat. IMO, Shultz is in the wrong here.
 
Probably staged the whole thing. Everybody will jump in with comments to support their guy. Clicks for everybody.
 
Isn't it supposed to be a place where people go to study or do homework quietly.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Bumper sticker:
“Friends Don’t Let Friends
Drink Starbucks”
But, then, these guys don’t seem as though they’re friends. 😀
 
Did yall know Jordan Schultz’s dad was the former CEO Starbucks, Howard Schultz?

I wonder what got him interested in becoming an insider.
He's also the reason the Supersonics is no longer a team...
Yeah, they should meet behind the gym for some fisticuffs. (n)
I see fisticuffs...I hit like...LOL

Ian was asked about it and said that wasn't true - it was just a random chance meeting.
Random chance meeting in Montana 2 weeks before legal tampering....

cool.gif
 
I’m proud to say that the one and only time I ever walked into a Starbucks, was for my ex wife. I’ve never had a cup of coffee before
I’m with you. I loved the smell of Community Coffee with chickory growing up … but I have never liked the taste
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom