Sailorsaint
Guest
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2005
- Messages
- 14,190
- Reaction score
- 25,343
Offline
It is, but is it a good idea to post papers prior to being peer reviewed?Good.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is, but is it a good idea to post papers prior to being peer reviewed?Good.
Depends.It is, but is it a good idea to post papers prior to being peer reviewed?
I guess, as long as the papers are just "observations" and some hypothetical conclusions based on that. But, if they are making any scientific claims, it could damage their reputation in the scientific community if they publish and are disproven later. I'm not complaining though, the more news and discoveries that come out, the better. I'm starving for some "educated guesses" as to what they are seeing.Depends.
When there is this much new info pouring in, you cant accept everything as 100% correct. It's more like scientific brainstorming, but still following the scientific method.
This isnt something as serious as public health.
I think the term is BTISNice photo.....until Webb takes aim at it. Hubble is still useful but is no longer the BMOC.
They should have named it BAT...Big Arse Telescope.I think the term is BTIS
Big Telescope in Space
lol3-4 decades from now