Offline
I don't like being trapped in ANY deals. I like normal signing bonuses and salary schedules that allow for maximum roster flexibility. I prefer mostly re-signing our own good players that we drafted to sensible deals over paying some other teams free agents that they let go. We know more about their fit on the field, in the community and locker room and are safer signings. I think we should maximize the draft by trading back to acquire more picks to build the foundation of the team and reward those that are successful.
I'm in full agreement with all of this. But, I will say that it's hard not to get trapped in ANY deals. It's the goal, but the reality is that it's near impossible to do and keep your young talented players.
The only way to do it is to just not sign any of the guys you drafted past their first deal unless it's a good bargain. And doing that means that you have to live with letting go of guys who may go on to be great with other teams. We are pissed about Hendrickson and Baun. Imagine how we would feel if that happened every other year.
The team that came the closest to doing that while having success was New England who regularly let their picks go after their first contract. They got away with it in part because they took so many picks, but we saw what happened to them when Brady left. So, it may be that it worked for them because they played in a weak division with a HoF QB, more than all those draft picks. So, while it's the goal, I'm not sure it's realistic to not get trapped in any deals. Probably the best you can do is only get trapped in deals with guys that are All Pro or at least Pro Bowl level talents.
But, having a franchise QB makes all this stuff so much easier.