Saints Cap Moves: $27,092,090 cap space ….. 8 restructures, 3 extensions, 3 pay cut, 1 release [All current cap moves are in OP] (73 Viewers)

Why do you think we weren't advancing in the playoffs? It's because Brees couldn't throw farther than 15 yards. We absolutely needed to draft a QB during those years and to say otherwise is foolish.
Please just stop, you are embarrassing yourself. We would have been in the SB in 2018 if not for the no call. . In 2020 if Cook would not have fumbled we would have beat the Bucs and went to the NFCCG. Losing in the playoffs had NOTHING to do with the strength of Brees's arm
Have a look at these passes he threw in 2019 . That's a pretty good bit further than 15yds don't you think? SMH

 
Well, that’s your opinion, but others, like Mike Triplett, view this as a clear sign the Saints are keeping their foot on the gas pedal, as opposed to rebuilding. So who’s correct? We shall see. I’m interested to read what Nick Underhill writes about all this.
The Saints don’t believe in rebuilding. Never have! Rebuilding does not guarantee success long term. It’s way too risky.
 
If he’s livid I’d say we’re on the right track then.
“Fletcher is livid” is the exact same sentence as “Fletcher is currently breathing” and “Fletcher has blinked at least twice within the last hour”

That man is never ever happy with the state of New Orleans sports teams and is never not thinking up a harebrained trade idea to post
 
Again, you’re missing the point. If you have a HOF QB you should draft another quarterback before he retires. We didn’t do that and look where we are versus the Packers who did exactly that.

Your sort of short term thinking is exactly the same as Mickey Loomis’, which is why we’re currently one of the worst teams in the NFL.
How did that work out for the Pats ? They wasted a pick on Jones and let Brady go and stunk for yrs until they drafted Maye and the jury is still out on him. The point YOU are missing is that just because you should be sorta looking for your HOF QB successor does not mean he will be available to you. AND if you've made the playoffs 4 yrs in a row and draft in the high 20's it would be foolish to trade multiple 1st rd picks to take a shot at a QB that will not play for 2-3 yrs. AND just what if you trade up and draft a Trey Lance ? THAT'S how GMs get fired SMH

You are once again delusional if you think we are one of the worst teams in the league. We were HURT last yr that and a bad HC were our biggest problems. Stop looking at things in a vacuum
 
“Fletcher is livid” is the exact same sentence as “Fletcher is currently breathing” and “Fletcher has blinked at least twice within the last hour”

That man is never ever happy with the state of New Orleans sports teams and is never not thinking up a harebrained trade idea to post
Fletcher is a hack always has been always will be
 
Eh? If they wanted to remove the no trade clause, Carr would have to agree to it. How does that make sense?

Also, you can’t change the length of a contract after it’s been signed and removing guaranteed income is literally a paycut.

You’ve, inadvertently, just said they were trying to agree to a pay cut, because everything else you listed is either impossible or illogical.
Again not true , They could have been talking about adding void yrs and that would need player approval, just like we did with McCoy. There are a few things that could have been talking to Carr about other than a pay cut .
 
I've already broke it down in other posts. We are 16th and that's only b/c of Carr, DD, Cam and Taysom. Remove those guys and we drop significantly. It's not hard to understand.


NFL 2024-25 Teams Ranked Oldest To Youngest​

RANKTEAMYRSMOSDAYTOTAL DAYS(2023 DAYS)
1.Buffalo Bills2752910042.67(9848.11)
2.Carolina Panthers2752010033.98(9579.66)
3.Cincinnati Bengals275910022.5(9414.39)
4.Cleveland Browns275910022.5(9660.58)
5.Minnesota Vikings2742310005.47(9596.09)
6.Miami Dolphins27469988.37(9704.49)
7.San Francisco 49ers270249986.9(9710.86)
8.Washington Commanders273189970.18(9654.23)
9.Pittsburgh Steelers27399961.98(9783.13)
10.Chicago Bears27229923.33(9770.16)
11.NY Jets270299891.6(9984.66)
12.Houston Texans270119873.94(9777.22)
13.Atlanta Falcons2611199857.2(9419.22)
14.Dallas Cowboys2611159846.83(9490.62)
15.Arizona Cardinals269189788.94(9762.71)
16.New Orleans Saints269129782.16(9944.86)
Yes this myth about us having an old roster is funny , They look at it in a vacuum. DC is 34 but QB's play well almost to their 40's. Offfensive linemen play well in their early to mid 30's . And some plkaywer that are in their 30's may not be starters
 
Eh? If they wanted to remove the no trade clause, Carr would have to agree to it. How does that make sense?
That's my point. Loomis said there were things to work on with his contract. That just means things that require both parties to agree to. A pay cut is just one of the things that both parties would have to agree to, so Loomis may have been referring to things that weren't pay cuts.

Also, you can’t change the length of a contract after it’s been signed and removing guaranteed income is literally a paycut.
Can't both parties agree to a new contract to replace the old one? Maybe the NFL doesn't allow that but it's commonly done outside the NFL.

You’ve, inadvertently, just said they were trying to agree to a pay cut, because everything else you listed is either impossible or illogical.
Everything I said is possible if both parties agree to it, unless the NFL doesn't allow renegotiating the length of the contract. The other things are renegotiable, but both parties would have to agree to it.

So, no, I didn't "inadvertently just say they were trying to agree to a pay cut." The fact is that Loomis could have been referring to things that aren't pay cuts.

I can not find a single quote from anyone in the Saints organization that they were asking Carr to take a pay cut.
 
Wonder if they’ll try the ol’ Friday afternoon news dump thing to announce a Derek Carr extension. 😂

Guess we went with the late Saturday evening news dump maneuver. Even more slick.

Regardless of if it helped mitigate the fallout or not, don’t think for one second that this wasn’t done intentionally. lol
 
Again not true , They could have been talking about adding void yrs and that would need player approval, just like we did with McCoy. There are a few things that could have been talking to Carr about other than a pay cut .
Adding void years makes no sense since the contract already has enough years to do a max restructure. 5 years is the most you can prorate a signing bonus and it must include the current year.
I think they wanted Carr to defer part of the $40M to next year. If that deferment was guaranteed to be paid next year then while technically it is considered a pay cut this year and requires the player’s permission, In reality he still gets every penny.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom