Saints signed QB Nathan Peterman (1 Viewer)

Someone fill me in on everyone laughing.

Is there some backstory on Peterman I'm unaware of?

Or did everyone think we were going to sign a high priced, stud backup QB... and therefore views this as a comical signing by our FO?
They saw the name and assumed it was a dumb signing because of Peterman memes and expecting a overpriced backup QB, not knowing signing Peterman is to help entrench Haener as the QB2 and using the cap wisely
 
Plenty of spin to be had, when you failed to sign Flacco to a backup deal and settle for Peterman. Those two QB’s are pieces for two completely different offseason strategies.
Not really. The only thing we know about Flacco is that we were interested in and perhaps offered. No evidence that we were anywhere near what he eventually got, which would explain why we pivoted to an option more in our price range.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom