- Joined
- May 3, 2010
- Messages
- 2,606
- Reaction score
- 2,301
Offline
Hopefully there will be more data collected like this......good work.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Vagueries? That's all you've got? Surely you're basing a personally held belief on more than that?
We'll find out in November, but I hope you're right.Times are changing.......Americans are fed up with sociopathic nonsense.
Eager to see how this will be defended? And I’m sure it will be here. Will there be any virtue signaling and rioting or looting etc. over what happened to this man? Or is it ok because he’s just a white guy? Will it get the same no MSM attention and outrage as the elderly white couple assassinated by the black man while visiting their dead son’s grave? Or the same coverage as the two elderly white people beaten to a pulp by the young black boxer, and filmed?
I know the answer. Sadly. It’s ok to murder white people
Anyone who defends this is as trash as the people in the video.
Ok, we need to pivot back to the point that the article Obama wrote was. He's not trashing the current admin. He doesn't even mention them.Every media clip of a Former President commenting on the actions of a Current President? Cross-Party, Same Party. It doesn't matter. From meme's to actual comments. If a Prior President doesn't agree with a Current President that is the story that runs for it's 15 mins of spotlight until the next comment is made.
From "Thanks Obama" to "Miss me Yet" to Regan/Bush commenting of Clinton's Impeachment to Clinton bashing Bush's response to Hurricane Katrina to Obama Bashing Trump on multiple occasions. It is not party specific but it is politics.
Second, I’ve heard some suggest that the recurrent problem of racial bias in our criminal justice system proves that only protests and direct action can bring about change, and that voting and participation in electoral politics is a waste of time. I couldn’t disagree more. The point of protest is to raise public awareness, to put a spotlight on injustice, and to make the powers that be uncomfortable; in fact, throughout American history, it’s often only been in response to protests and civil disobedience that the political system has even paid attention to marginalized communities. But eventually, aspirations have to be translated into specific laws and institutional practices — and in a democracy, that only happens when we elect government officials who are responsive to our demands.
Moreover, it’s important for us to understand which levels of government have the biggest impact on our criminal justice system and police practices. When we think about politics, a lot of us focus only on the presidency and the federal government. And yes, we should be fighting to make sure that we have a president, a Congress, a U.S. Justice Department, and a federal judiciary that actually recognize the ongoing, corrosive role that racism plays in our society and want to do something about it. But the elected officials who matter most in reforming police departments and the criminal justice system work at the state and local levels.
It’s mayors and county executives that appoint most police chiefs and negotiate collective bargaining agreements with police unions. It’s district attorneys and state’s attorneys that decide whether or not to investigate and ultimately charge those involved in police misconduct. Those are all elected positions. In some places, police review boards with the power to monitor police conduct are elected as well. Unfortunately, voter turnout in these local races is usually pitifully low, especially among young people — which makes no sense given the direct impact these offices have on social justice issues, not to mention the fact that who wins and who loses those seats is often determined by just a few thousand, or even a few hundred, votes.
Ok, we need to pivot back to the point that the article Obama wrote was. He's not trashing the current admin. He doesn't even mention them.
He's talking about protest, violence, and translating that to political action. He's a calming influence on an uncalm situation. Take this part...
So, let's all get off that tangent, and if you want to address the merits of what was written in this article, then go for it to a point.
it's actually exactly what I told my kid. What will he do about it in a month from now? in 6 months? Protest doesn't fix anything, it bring attention. Guess what, attention.. .Mission Accomplished!
Now, let's have some action.
Good idea to start this threadMan. 50 pages have been generated in this thread since Saturday afternoon. I got some skimming and catching up to do.
We'll find out in November, but I hope you're right.
Ok, we need to pivot back to the point that the article Obama wrote was. He's not trashing the current admin. He doesn't even mention them.
He's talking about protest, violence, and translating that to political action. He's a calming influence on an uncalm situation. Take this part...
So, let's all get off that tangent, and if you want to address the merits of what was written in this article, then go for it to a point.
it's actually exactly what I told my kid. What will he do about it in a month from now? in 6 months? Protest doesn't fix anything, it bring attention. Guess what, attention.. .Mission Accomplished!
Now, let's have some action.
The question is, will we have the stamina and focus to keep on it with the wall of distraction that’s getting ready to rain down?Times are changing.......Americans are fed up with sociopathic nonsense.
Let's just hope it isn't a repeat of 1968.
But the attention is now focused on property destruction, civil unrest and the President's actions and not on the death of a man caused byrecklessracist Police Officers.