Which Position Should the Team Avoid at #9? (6 Viewers)

What position do you not want taken at 9?


  • Total voters
    115
Sigh. There you go again. I didnt call your premise silly. I said it's counterproductive. It's counterproductive because you specifically said...



THIS is illogical sense the specific player being drafted is the most important part of drafting equation. You didn't like my answer and now here we are with you throwing a tantrum because I suggested the premise was misguided. But then even though I thought the premise was misguided, after I stated why I thought it was the wrong way to look at it, I did my best to respond to your question. Because after all, you did create a thread to ask that specific question.

So when I said...


That means I'm only doing it because you asked. It means I'd rather not, but since you did....I will and you called me sanctimonious for answering the question you asked, although I wholly reject the premise of it.

Damn me for trying to give you an honest answer and explaining why. When most posters haven't left a response explaining their choice, I at least tried and you called me names for it. I gave you my opinion and you called me sanctimonious. I explained why I picked the position (in a thread where you asked us to pick a position) and you said I'm trashing the position. Smh...this is pointless.
That's some grade A projecting if I've ever seen it! This is quite the victim complex you've spun yourself. You labeling me the whiner after multiple walls of text is rich. :smilielol:

I called it sanctimonious, because it patently was. I haven't thrown a tantrum at all, in fact, I have calmly and plainly pointed out the flaws in your logic and never once "called you names" until you tried to challenge my comprehension. I even granted that I was clumsy in my initial phrasing. Even then I took the high road until you doubled down. You're so high on your own opinion, er, WalterFootball's opinion-- that you can't just accept that your initial post smacked of some infallible take (again, not even your own) and then doubled down with some hilariously misplaced condescension. You were sanctimonious and you got called on it. This is a message board, sir, not a GM seminar.

You're absolutely right that it's pointless, since you can't craft a single paragraph without use of logical fallacy. The post was initially meant to be fun and frivolous, a point 99% of the posters here had no problem with.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom