Offline
Ha! Take that to all those people who shake their head at me as I drink my Jack and Coke Zeros in the morning!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BuzzkillNot to put a cold blanket on this because I want it to be true, but this all appears to be based on epidemiology and not actual blind studies (which obviously have ethical issues) so the results are never going to have a hugely high confidence level. At best more likely than not. That's especially the case when you are talking about increasing/reducing risk as opposed to actual causation.
Also, from the article:
"Past studies have found moderate drinking was linked to lower mortality. However, some researchers were dubious, asking whether those who drink moderate amounts aren’t just healthier overall than abstainers. That question remains. In some cases, people abstained from drinking because of prior health issues, further muddling the data. While the NASEM committee tried to avoid this pitfall in its study selection, other variables may be at play.
The committee’s reviews were limited by a “consistent set of research gaps,” the report says. Among those are a lack of standard definitions of alcohol consumption levels, underreporting of alcohol consumption by study participants, as well as a lack of data stratified by age, sex, smoking status and genetic ancestry. Many studies are also observational, making them less rigorous."
Not to put a cold blanket on this because I want it to be true, but this all appears to be based on epidemiology and not actual blind studies (which obviously have ethical issues) so the results are never going to have a hugely high confidence level. At best more likely than not. That's especially the case when you are talking about increasing/reducing risk as opposed to actual causation.
Also, from the article:
"Past studies have found moderate drinking was linked to lower mortality. However, some researchers were dubious, asking whether those who drink moderate amounts aren’t just healthier overall than abstainers. That question remains. In some cases, people abstained from drinking because of prior health issues, further muddling the data. While the NASEM committee tried to avoid this pitfall in its study selection, other variables may be at play.
The committee’s reviews were limited by a “consistent set of research gaps,” the report says. Among those are a lack of standard definitions of alcohol consumption levels, underreporting of alcohol consumption by study participants, as well as a lack of data stratified by age, sex, smoking status and genetic ancestry. Many studies are also observational, making them less rigorous."
Buzzkill
Like, literally
Simple extrapolation.Clearly, by all you’s lack of understanding of science, heavy drinking would be even better
You’ve been putting wet blankets on everything lately: can’t shoot CEOs, employees going on strike isn’t impressive, now a dissertation arguing against the heath benefits of boozing it up.Not to put a cold blanket on this because I want it to be true, but this all appears to be based on epidemiology and not actual blind studies (which obviously have ethical issues) so the results are never going to have a hugely high confidence level. At best more likely than not. That's especially the case when you are talking about increasing/reducing risk as opposed to actual causation.
Also, from the article:
"Past studies have found moderate drinking was linked to lower mortality. However, some researchers were dubious, asking whether those who drink moderate amounts aren’t just healthier overall than abstainers. That question remains. In some cases, people abstained from drinking because of prior health issues, further muddling the data. While the NASEM committee tried to avoid this pitfall in its study selection, other variables may be at play.
The committee’s reviews were limited by a “consistent set of research gaps,” the report says. Among those are a lack of standard definitions of alcohol consumption levels, underreporting of alcohol consumption by study participants, as well as a lack of data stratified by age, sex, smoking status and genetic ancestry. Many studies are also observational, making them less rigorous."
Yea maybe we should uhhh.....poison a CEOs drink right? Yall would like that huh? Hur derrrYou’ve been putting wet blankets on everything lately: can’t shoot CEOs, employees going on strike isn’t impressive, now a dissertation arguing against the heath benefits of boozing it up.
Geez, Louweezy, can I lift weights today or are you going to tell me don’t bother since I’m still gonna die one day anyway.
You’ve been putting wet blankets on everything lately: can’t shoot CEOs, employees going on strike isn’t impressive, now a dissertation arguing against the heath benefits of boozing it up.
Geez, Louweezy, can I lift weights today or are you going to tell me don’t bother since I’m still gonna die one day anyway.
I blame antipop for everything, since the early 2000’s. I’ve gotten away with a lot too and it’s funny because nobody knows who the hell I’m talking about when I say, “it’s antipop’s fault”, but they somehow accept it.I know. I'm not happy about it. I blame antipop for becoming a hermit. He kept me grounded. Either that or the holidays are getting me down.
And you are still going to die one day.
If you really want to go to the next level tell him what day.And you are still going to die one day.
ThursdayIf you really want to go to the next level tell him what day.