Report: Moderate drinkers have lower risk of death (1 Viewer)

Not to put a cold blanket on this because I want it to be true, but this all appears to be based on epidemiology and not actual blind studies (which obviously have ethical issues) so the results are never going to have a hugely high confidence level. At best more likely than not. That's especially the case when you are talking about increasing/reducing risk as opposed to actual causation.

Also, from the article:

"Past studies have found moderate drinking was linked to lower mortality. However, some researchers were dubious, asking whether those who drink moderate amounts aren’t just healthier overall than abstainers. That question remains. In some cases, people abstained from drinking because of prior health issues, further muddling the data. While the NASEM committee tried to avoid this pitfall in its study selection, other variables may be at play.

The committee’s reviews were limited by a “consistent set of research gaps,” the report says. Among those are a lack of standard definitions of alcohol consumption levels, underreporting of alcohol consumption by study participants, as well as a lack of data stratified by age, sex, smoking status and genetic ancestry. Many studies are also observational, making them less rigorous."
Buzzkill
Like, literally
 
Not to put a cold blanket on this because I want it to be true, but this all appears to be based on epidemiology and not actual blind studies (which obviously have ethical issues) so the results are never going to have a hugely high confidence level. At best more likely than not. That's especially the case when you are talking about increasing/reducing risk as opposed to actual causation.

Also, from the article:

"Past studies have found moderate drinking was linked to lower mortality. However, some researchers were dubious, asking whether those who drink moderate amounts aren’t just healthier overall than abstainers. That question remains. In some cases, people abstained from drinking because of prior health issues, further muddling the data. While the NASEM committee tried to avoid this pitfall in its study selection, other variables may be at play.

The committee’s reviews were limited by a “consistent set of research gaps,” the report says. Among those are a lack of standard definitions of alcohol consumption levels, underreporting of alcohol consumption by study participants, as well as a lack of data stratified by age, sex, smoking status and genetic ancestry. Many studies are also observational, making them less rigorous."

 
Not to put a cold blanket on this because I want it to be true, but this all appears to be based on epidemiology and not actual blind studies (which obviously have ethical issues) so the results are never going to have a hugely high confidence level. At best more likely than not. That's especially the case when you are talking about increasing/reducing risk as opposed to actual causation.

Also, from the article:

"Past studies have found moderate drinking was linked to lower mortality. However, some researchers were dubious, asking whether those who drink moderate amounts aren’t just healthier overall than abstainers. That question remains. In some cases, people abstained from drinking because of prior health issues, further muddling the data. While the NASEM committee tried to avoid this pitfall in its study selection, other variables may be at play.

The committee’s reviews were limited by a “consistent set of research gaps,” the report says. Among those are a lack of standard definitions of alcohol consumption levels, underreporting of alcohol consumption by study participants, as well as a lack of data stratified by age, sex, smoking status and genetic ancestry. Many studies are also observational, making them less rigorous."
You’ve been putting wet blankets on everything lately: can’t shoot CEOs, employees going on strike isn’t impressive, now a dissertation arguing against the heath benefits of boozing it up. :jpshakehead:

Geez, Louweezy, can I lift weights today or are you going to tell me don’t bother since I’m still gonna die one day anyway. :shrug:





:hihi:
 
You’ve been putting wet blankets on everything lately: can’t shoot CEOs, employees going on strike isn’t impressive, now a dissertation arguing against the heath benefits of boozing it up. :jpshakehead:

Geez, Louweezy, can I lift weights today or are you going to tell me don’t bother since I’m still gonna die one day anyway. :shrug:





:hihi:
Yea maybe we should uhhh.....poison a CEOs drink right? Yall would like that huh? Hur derrr
 
You’ve been putting wet blankets on everything lately: can’t shoot CEOs, employees going on strike isn’t impressive, now a dissertation arguing against the heath benefits of boozing it up. :jpshakehead:

Geez, Louweezy, can I lift weights today or are you going to tell me don’t bother since I’m still gonna die one day anyway. :shrug:





:hihi:

I know. I'm not happy about it. I blame antipop for becoming a hermit. He kept me grounded. Either that or the holidays are getting me down.

And you are still going to die one day.
 
Last edited:
I know. I'm not happy about it. I blame antipop for becoming a hermit. He kept me grounded. Either that or the holidays are getting me down.

And you are still going to die one day.
I blame antipop for everything, since the early 2000’s. I’ve gotten away with a lot too and it’s funny because nobody knows who the hell I’m talking about when I say, “it’s antipop’s fault”, but they somehow accept it. :hihi:
 
widge was the wettest of blankets long before he met me…i think the Great Depression really did a number on him
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom