Offline
That's probably because to you everything means less than zero, hey, red.No offense to you, but your opinion has no value to me. Like zero.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's probably because to you everything means less than zero, hey, red.No offense to you, but your opinion has no value to me. Like zero.
Loomis be like:Seahawks spending all this money to win like 6 games. Yikes.
Yeah 45 is insaneWould love to have him but not for $45 million.
$15 million a year
What he DID do was not overpay or try to outbid another team. You’re trying way too hard to manufacture “fails” for Loomis. Save it for the times he really does make a blunder.I find it funny that there is so much relief from what Loomis didn’t do more than there is excitement for what he has done. Shows the faith we have have in him as a GM right now.
What he DID do was not overpay or try to outbid another team. You’re trying way too hard to manufacture “fails” for Loomis. Save it for the times he really does make a blunder.
And get over the fact that they didn’t cut Carr. Your position had merit but had major drawbacks. So far, we’ve been very reasonable and prudent in free agency.
Some of the best free agent moves are the ones you don’t make.I’m glad we didn’t get him. He is a declining player. We can spend that money somewhere else.
Absolutely.Yeah, I have some question marks about his health and frankly he's not the player he was.
We’ve been exactly what people who have a disdain for Loomis keep saying he won’t do. This is the 3rd year running he’s shown restraint.What he DID do was not overpay or try to outbid another team. You’re trying way too hard to manufacture “fails” for Loomis. Save it for the times he really does make a blunder.
And get over the fact that they didn’t cut Carr. Your position had merit but had major drawbacks. So far, we’ve been very reasonable and prudent in free agency.