I don't see that way and I'm not saying I'm right with that perspective but just giving a person the benefit of doubt. Its an honest discussion regardless and OP is being civil about it, without taking shots but some are coming at OP trying to needle with little shots (I might be borrowing some from this thread or the other thread where this discussion moved).I think the poster trying to inject the VAERS data into the civil suits discussion is using it as a red herring. It's useless for those purposes, and sows doubt about every other reporting agency, basically saying that if VAERS is no good, therefore there's no good reliable reporting out there. Precisely why he's asking why we don't come up with a better system for reporting data. He's just trying to get people to question everything, because then he can make it look like his position is equally valid. He's clearly wrong, and I think deliberately misleading.
I happen to have a co-worker who I travel with often, decide to get the vaccine but once that coworker was handed the paper work regarding liability, decided to not take the vaccine. So this is a real issue and does stop some people from taking the vaccine and this person had Covid before and almost lost their significant other to Covid spending weeks in ICU, so they KNOW the dangers but the non-liability was a deal breaker.