Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't you mean K. Saundersjack heflin is like "whaaaaaaa?"
nah- we cut heflin and traded for basically the same guy, no?Don't you mean K. Saunders
In before complaints about not trading for an OT in a system that doesn't value anything other than LT. lol
Saunders isn’t getting cut lol
I was speaking more towards Saunders spot on the depth chart, he was loosing time to Breese and Shepard now with Ridgeway on board.....nah- we cut heflin and traded for basically the same guy, no?
I've heard that too and that's the only other way this move could make sense. I don't understand though why we wouldn't just IR him since we can't cut an injured vet outright. Perhaps that's coming.
But even when we have carried a second nose on the 53, which isn't all the time, we typically make that guy a healthy scratch anyway. So why trade for one?
This won’t be popular but Saunders is not at all an asset on the line. Slightly below average imo. As is Shepherd.I was speaking more towards Saunders spot on the depth chart, he was loosing time to Breese and Shepard now with Ridgeway on board.....