Educate me guys: how likely WAS it that we would have signed Culpepper? (1 Viewer)

Purple Haze

Taste it. You'll love it.
Joined
Apr 21, 2006
Messages
11,000
Reaction score
3,690
Age
42
Location
609, bangin on the wall
Offline
Because what i'm hearing is that the FO basically told Brees, "We want you here." Didn't question his health or his ability to get healthy. That's one thing he has said that made him feel so at home coming to NO.

Did we want Brees all along and snag him up? Or was he the best of two choices?
 
Joined
Mar 8, 2002
Messages
1,007
Reaction score
35
Age
55
Offline
I never heard anything about us wanting to trade for Culpepper
 

whodatfever

UNSOBER
Joined
Mar 30, 2004
Messages
11,854
Reaction score
7,132
Age
48
Offline
Culpepper was never an option. Payton is a character guy. Saban is too so he dropped the ball BIG time on that one.
 

Wingdog

Hall-of-Famer
VIP Contributor
Joined
Feb 26, 2004
Messages
3,925
Reaction score
795
Age
43
Location
Jacksonville Beach, FL
Offline
We probably would've drafted Leinart or Young if Brees didn't sign with us, before we found out Houston was taking Mario of course.
 

CajunSaint

Hall of Famer
Gold VIP Contributor
Joined
Aug 19, 2001
Messages
7,456
Reaction score
8,144
Location
Metry...Missing Lafayette.
Offline
Because what i'm hearing is that the FO basically told Brees, "We want you here." Didn't question his health or his ability to get healthy. That's one thing he has said that made him feel so at home coming to NO.

Did we want Brees all along and snag him up? Or was he the best of two choices?


Culpepper was not an option. Minnesota wanted a 2nd round pick and there is no way that the Saints wouldve given up pick #34 for Culpep.

Like you said, they wanted Brees all along and got their man. If for some reason he didnt sign, they wouldve targeted McCown and probably drafted a Qb to compete. Also, rumors came out recently that Payton was after Romo, but I think that is just heresay.
 

Danchrism

Guest
Joined
Nov 5, 2006
Messages
12,371
Reaction score
2,645
Offline
^ You're right about McCown. Could've brought him in for much less, and addressed other needs. However, I'm glad as to how this turned out for us, CB play notwithstanding.
 

Frank The Rat

Official SR twitter team
VIP Contributor
Joined
Apr 20, 2000
Messages
22,867
Reaction score
7,819
Age
44
Location
Albany, LA
Offline
Negative Zero.Zero that makes me cry just thinking of the smallest of chances we would have ended up with culpepper
 

VishaL

All-Pro
Joined
Aug 21, 2006
Messages
1,310
Reaction score
29
Age
38
Offline
So If Culpepper Is Availble Next Yr U Dont Think Payton Would Look At Him?
 

Wahoo

miles away
Gold VIP Contributor
Joined
Oct 31, 2005
Messages
4,492
Reaction score
690
Age
61
Location
Pensacola, FL
Offline
^ You're right about McCown. Could've brought him in for much less, and addressed other needs. However, I'm glad as to how this turned out for us, CB play notwithstanding.

Seems like a recall that McCown was actually on an airplane heading to NOLA when Brees was signed, so they cancelled the planned visit -- anyone else remember that ?

As far as the original question goes, I never heard one word connecting Culpepper to the Saints.
 

kfran

TwoDat! Let's Do It Again
VIP Subscribing Member
VIP Contributor
Joined
Oct 26, 2006
Messages
8,225
Reaction score
5,177
Location
Irving, Texas via NOLA
Offline
Culpepper was not an option. Minnesota wanted a 2nd round pick and there is no way that the Saints wouldve given up pick #34 for Culpep.

Like you said, they wanted Brees all along and got their man. If for some reason he didnt sign, they wouldve targeted McCown and probably drafted a Qb to compete. Also, rumors came out recently that Payton was after Romo, but I think that is just heresay.



Not really hearsay... Payton brought Romo to Dallas as a free agent - They both went to the same College. I'm sure someone's probably posted this before.

Romo was hands-off, however, because Parcells had JJ lock him up with a lucrative extension last year. I believe I have it right - Had Romo been a viable option, we may have seen him here.

Romo may have a great future, but I'll take Brees anyday - Right now, there are only two others I would even consider over Brees: P. Manning or T. Brady. Yet, I'd probably pick D. Brees over both of those because he's just the right fit for the Saints and the city.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom