St. Pike
Representing Proudly
Offline
For the record, I am never for "choosing" the so- called easy(ier) opponent.
I also don't by into the impossibility of beating a team 3 times. With each encounter each team can learn something about their opponent, but there isn't inherent that the winner of two is ad a greater disadvantage, except over- confidence. I would think the The Seahawks and Rams would had beaten that out of them... if not, then they deserve to lose.
BTW, the same could said about playing the Lions for the second time.
It's like this.... you flip a coin and three times it lands on tails. What are the chances of it landing on heads? ANSWER: 50%. Yes, you could argue this is overly simplistic, however it proves an important fundamental truth. The laws of probability doesn't change because of previous results.
---
I also don't by into the impossibility of beating a team 3 times. With each encounter each team can learn something about their opponent, but there isn't inherent that the winner of two is ad a greater disadvantage, except over- confidence. I would think the The Seahawks and Rams would had beaten that out of them... if not, then they deserve to lose.
BTW, the same could said about playing the Lions for the second time.
It's like this.... you flip a coin and three times it lands on tails. What are the chances of it landing on heads? ANSWER: 50%. Yes, you could argue this is overly simplistic, however it proves an important fundamental truth. The laws of probability doesn't change because of previous results.
---