Offline
It was a dirty play and for DA to defend it is atrocious. Apologizes for a touchdown but defends a dirty play.
That speaks volumes......
That speaks volumes......
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm trying to look at it objectively. If it was Carr and a Falcons lineman was doing it, I would applaud McCoy for defending his QB. I've got no problem with the center waylaying Shepherd.just saw a replay of it. its not a green bay driving the shoulder into the ground kinda thing, i would argue its a player who still thinks the qb has the ball and is trying to bring him down. that slime lineman that dove in head first knew exactly where the football was, he can suck eggs.
And while they are at it, suspend all the players who are targeting with their helmets. They are ending players’ careers. But the league won’t do it.Not much has been said of this outside of the Gameday thread. I think the NFL would be perfectly justified in suspending him for that play. It was super dirty.
NFL must suspend Nathan Shepherd for his apparent attempt to injure Justin Herbert
If the league is serious about player safety, this is a no-brainer.www.nbcsports.com
This.Does anyone else think he didn’t know Herbert had released the ball? He just shoveled it and Shepherd was on ground and didn’t see it, it seemed to me. Now to be fair the whistle had blown (did he hear it) and no need to keep twisting but Herbert wouldn’t go down on a play Shepherd thought was still alive.
Does Shepherd have any history of being a dirty player or a hothead?
Heck, they aren't even calling penalties. Olave has been hit in the head at least 3 times and crickets.And while they are at it, suspend all the players who are targeting with their helmets. They are ending players careers. But the league won’t do it.
That was the driving factor behind my post.Heck, they aren't even calling penalties. Olave has been hit in the head at least 3 times and crickets.
How do you know what his intent was? Did he say anything after the game about his mindset?Incredibly dirty play. Clear intent.
How do you know what his intent was? Did he say anything after the game about his mindset?
To add to that (and maybe someone else has said it; I haven't read the whole thread) did it not look like to anyone else that he was having issues with his eyes immediately after the play? He went straight to the sidelines and put eye drops in. It sure looked like he got poked in the eye but no one in the broadcast even wanted to talk about it. They just wanted to rage about him instead of reporting about what was on screen. I wish the director had stepped in and said something to them about it.Does anyone else think he didn’t know Herbert had released the ball? He just shoveled it and Shepherd was on ground and didn’t see it, it seemed to me. Now to be fair the whistle had blown (did he hear it) and no need to keep twisting but Herbert wouldn’t go down on a play Shepherd thought was still alive.
Does Shepherd have any history of being a dirty player or a hothead?
I watched the play with both eyes open.
So what? That doesn't mean a thing. Only he knows what his intent was. I definitely don't think he meant to be malicious. He was trying to take Herbert down because he broke several tackles earlier in the game.I watched the play with both eyes open.
It was indeed a dangerous tackle, and if intentional, it was dirty.I would cut Shepherd to show the team and the league that the Saints won't accept certain behaviours. There was no call for what he did just frustration.