albionmoonlight
Can. Shall. Will.
Offline
In fairness to the NFL, correcting ESPN's mistakes would be a pretty full-time undertaking for any organization.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wonder what would have happened if Duncan would have taken the Saints side. Instead the national media got to quote him bashing the Saints, which justified their position, over and over. What if Duncan instead wrote about how in "15000" pages there were 7 pages with anything to do with bounties with the "smoking gun" being an actual picture of Dog the bounty hunter.
Why would the national media question anything when the main local guy is like "yep they did it". He really screwed us on that one. Like in hindsight maybe worse than we thought.
Nothing will ever make up for that bounty fiasco.
But I thought I'd never want to hear about it again, and now that's changed. I like the fact that it keeps coming up. Nothing will bring our picks back or our coach back or that season back.
Nothing can be done about that.
But, going forward, the fact that it's really the starting point for the Commissioner's fraudulent and irresponsible and megalomaniacal and arbitrary handling of the league is at least a bit satisfying. Many people see the fraud of the bountygate and will point to his ineptness and his lack of concern for truth or transparency, to the point of having a former Commissioner step in and contradict him publicly.
I've gone from not wanting to hear about it at all to wanting them to bring it up every possible opportunity because now it serves as an albatross around his neck.
Nothing will ever make up for that bounty fiasco.
But I thought I'd never want to hear about it again, and now that's changed. I like the fact that it keeps coming up. Nothing will bring our picks back or our coach back or that season back.
Nothing can be done about that.
But, going forward, the fact that it's really the starting point for the Commissioner's fraudulent and irresponsible and megalomaniacal and arbitrary handling of the league is at least a bit satisfying. Many people see the fraud of the bountygate and will point to his ineptness and his lack of concern for truth or transparency, to the point of having a former Commissioner step in and contradict him publicly.
I've gone from not wanting to hear about it at all to wanting them to bring it up every possible opportunity because now it serves as an albatross around his neck.
Did the NFL actually ever say how many balls were under inflated. My impression was that it was an ESPN report (from a leaked source). If the NFL never officially released that information, why would they correct the report?
Personally, I have such mixed feelings about this whole thing. It makes me mad that nobody stuck up for the Saints during Bountygate the way people have this time. But on the other hand this Judge Berman isn't letting Goodell squirm out of the tough questions - I really think Goodell's time as commissioner is growing short.
Goodell avoids question on league
That’s a lot of words, none of which directly answer the question. It’s obvious that the league doesn’t want to answer the question, because there is no good answer. But that doesn’t excuse the chronic failure to address the situation directly, or to investigate the leak that became a report that turned a curiosity into a hashtag.
Here’s some free legal advice for the NFL. If Judge Richard M. Berman asks Goodell or one of the lawyers that same question tomorrow, Judge Berman will keep asking it until he gets a direct answer.
Personally, I have such mixed feelings about this whole thing. It makes me mad that nobody stuck up for the Saints during Bountygate the way people have this time. But on the other hand this Judge Berman isn't letting Goodell squirm out of the tough questions - I really think Goodell's time as commissioner is growing short.
Florio, who wrote this article at PFT, is the one person who--after looking at everything, such as the dearth of actual evidence and the use of silly bits and pieces as so-called "evidence"--is the one person who started questioning Goodell and his motives during the bounty scandal. He's at it again. My guess is there is no love lost between these two and Florio is out to have him replaced eventually.
I disagree with some that are saying Goodell's days are numbered. I believe this is wishful thinking. He is making the owners a lot of money, and that's what he is truly the commissioner of--their bank accounts. On that front he is doing a remarkable job.