- Joined
- Nov 8, 2003
- Messages
- 31,380
- Reaction score
- 25,285
Offline
Sure makes you feel that way.Cause this way they can rig the game to go as they want. It's all about the benjamins.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sure makes you feel that way.Cause this way they can rig the game to go as they want. It's all about the benjamins.
It only fuels the theory that they want the officials (league) to have this tool to influence games and season outcomes.
What a joke. They never actually gave it a chance anyway. The XFL had the best way of doing it, wish the NFL would be open to that level of transparency.
Yet we will still give this league our viewership and$$$ year in and year out
Thats the point, if they wanted to get it right they easily could, they want to be able to control outcomes when they want to and then have plausible deniability.I just don't understand the reluctance to get these things right? Like do they really think the game is better when people at home can see blatantly wrong calls in real time? Like the technology isn't just available to get this right, its been around long enough to be legally drink.
Just have a central video hub in NYC or LA, allow a small crew to buzz into games to work with head officials on the field to trigger replays. It doesn't have to take forever, and you can set limitations on it... but in the 21st century we should be able to have accurate calls on the field. It's absurd that the NFL isn't pushing hard to simply get things right.
I agree about the sleaziness of Riveron, but the blatant non-enforcement of the rule by the NY office had to involve the top brass. It was the plan from the start by Goodell and all and not just a rogue Riveron situation. They didn't fool anyone (see the replies below the ProFootballTalk article) but they don't care and it doesn't matter. All of our anger and warranted complaining just falls on deaf ears and they'll still succeed as a business in spite of their ineptitude.It's Riveron. I've had my eye on that guy since the time he was on-field official. He has always been a shady character.
I swear, years from now, there will be an ESPN 30 for 30 on that guy. Something just isn't right with him.
I knew the very moment I heard he was going to be the head of officiating and in charge of all replays, that all of a sudden bizarre stuff was going to suddenly start occurring.
I agree Riveron got his marching orders from roger to sabotage the whole thing. And it is undeniable that roger doesn't care because he knows the fans are not going anywhere, and he will continue to make tens of millions for doing a crappy job. He has the best gig in the world.I agree about the sleaziness of Riveron, but the blatant non-enforcement of the rule by the NY office had to involve the top brass. It was the plan from the start by Goodell and all and not just a rogue Riveron situation. They didn't fool anyone (see the replies below the ProFootballTalk article) but they don't care and it doesn't matter. All of our anger and warranted complaining just falls on deaf ears and they'll still succeed as a business in spite of their ineptitude.
They just need to make a "Common Sense" rule in case of a game altering blown call. Would that be so hard?