There's actually plenty more beef I could shell out including a couple of positive amendments from last week which really could have helped our troops and war on terror policy. And while that was directed to MLU, I'm going to have to ahead and state that despite what you have otherwise indicated, your contempt is partisan. Because it goes like this - I've posted several times in threads where I believe you were involved (though not directly to you) to those hanging from Bobby Jindal's jockstrap and others who claim to support Senator Vitter (both are gentlemen who I have voted for) without looking it up, what have either of those guys done? It turns out, not much. In Jindal's case, it's about hype and hope. Because not only has he had completely undistinguished rookie and sophomore terms in the U.S. House, he got lapped by Charlie Melancon who spent his rookie year in the minority party.
In Mary's case, there is a lot of beef out there and some votes I happen to disagree with. Aligning herself with the McCain moderates allowed several Bush judges (including Supreme Court Jusitices Alito and Roberts) to get votes. It doesn't matter how she voted because they were going to win anyway. She defeated her own party's efforts to stymie and filabuster (sp?) those and other judicial nominees.
Additionally, she is very well thought of on the Armed Services Committee. She helped engineer Federal City for the remants of the commisary (no matter what ultimately happens because it's a state and federal issue). Let's don't forget, she's only in her second term. And unlike Sentor Vitter, after all of a year and a half, she certainly hasn't been making headlines the wrong way.
And this is where you're completely off base:
Good grief, take a look at what that old fogey Robert Byrd brings to West Virginia of all places. I would love to see even a modest portion of that investment come to Louisiana, who unfortunately happens to share bottom five status with West Virginia is a lot of unfortunate categories.
Senator Byrd HAS SENIORITY. Our last Senator with a shot at some clout, John Breaux, sold out to K Street. Byrd has been in there forever. That's the way things work and how I initially introduced Mary into this entire debate. The only way you get anything (outside of natural disaster of the magnitude we faced) is by tenure. That's the way the game is played. It's explained directly on the home page of the U.S. Senate for you or anyone else who like to know how it all works. You have to move up, and the only way you move up is by getting reelected. We may like or dislike that system, but it's the only one we've got. And Senator Vitter isn't helping our cause. Mary isn't known for the wrong reasons. If you say her voice isn't given any weight, maybe you could expound on that. But then again, she's been working her way up.
Also, in case you didn't know, MLU has been a fierce Landrieu critic. He's met her and generally can't stand her. But he realizes the value of the royalty bills, and I think he also understands the value of tenure.
TPS
In Mary's case, there is a lot of beef out there and some votes I happen to disagree with. Aligning herself with the McCain moderates allowed several Bush judges (including Supreme Court Jusitices Alito and Roberts) to get votes. It doesn't matter how she voted because they were going to win anyway. She defeated her own party's efforts to stymie and filabuster (sp?) those and other judicial nominees.
Additionally, she is very well thought of on the Armed Services Committee. She helped engineer Federal City for the remants of the commisary (no matter what ultimately happens because it's a state and federal issue). Let's don't forget, she's only in her second term. And unlike Sentor Vitter, after all of a year and a half, she certainly hasn't been making headlines the wrong way.
And this is where you're completely off base:
Good grief, take a look at what that old fogey Robert Byrd brings to West Virginia of all places. I would love to see even a modest portion of that investment come to Louisiana, who unfortunately happens to share bottom five status with West Virginia is a lot of unfortunate categories.
Senator Byrd HAS SENIORITY. Our last Senator with a shot at some clout, John Breaux, sold out to K Street. Byrd has been in there forever. That's the way things work and how I initially introduced Mary into this entire debate. The only way you get anything (outside of natural disaster of the magnitude we faced) is by tenure. That's the way the game is played. It's explained directly on the home page of the U.S. Senate for you or anyone else who like to know how it all works. You have to move up, and the only way you move up is by getting reelected. We may like or dislike that system, but it's the only one we've got. And Senator Vitter isn't helping our cause. Mary isn't known for the wrong reasons. If you say her voice isn't given any weight, maybe you could expound on that. But then again, she's been working her way up.
Also, in case you didn't know, MLU has been a fierce Landrieu critic. He's met her and generally can't stand her. But he realizes the value of the royalty bills, and I think he also understands the value of tenure.
TPS