Sazed
Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2004
- Messages
- 146
- Reaction score
- 217
Offline
Who would we replace him with that will provide the same or better play for less or equal money? You have a choice between a Journeyman vet or an unproven rookie. From what I can remember about the 2 year deal he signed in 2006 it was a very reasonable deal for a starting RT.
A team has to be very careful about where they spend their money, you cannot have the best player at every position. I think the cost/benefit ratio for this guy is great assuming we can sign him for similar money he got on his last deal.
As far as his play I think it has been slightly above average, a B- if I had to put a grade on it. I can recall several times where the TV guys have singled him out on a good play he made. Several people have already mentioned that he is a very good open field blocker on screen plays, he is a good pass blocker and an average to slightly below average run blocker at the line.
A team has to be very careful about where they spend their money, you cannot have the best player at every position. I think the cost/benefit ratio for this guy is great assuming we can sign him for similar money he got on his last deal.
As far as his play I think it has been slightly above average, a B- if I had to put a grade on it. I can recall several times where the TV guys have singled him out on a good play he made. Several people have already mentioned that he is a very good open field blocker on screen plays, he is a good pass blocker and an average to slightly below average run blocker at the line.