Physics problem... Stumped (1 Viewer)

[Bayouboy]

4

I came up with the same thing. Go with it.

 

[SaintAkira]

It's gotta be elebentybillion.

Please post the solution.

 

[SWJJ]

If all you need to find is the force of gravity on the object, it's

Fg=G(m1m2/r^2)

Remember to add the radius of the Earth to 2.90 × 10 ^6 m to get the value for r.

I did not have m2

But apparently it did not matter..

Answer was 4.63 m/s^2

 

[ClayT101]

Fg=G(m1m2/r^2)

That looks correct from what I remember, but what does the big G stand for.

Also, if I remember correctly, the satillite is accelerating. The change in direction does count as acceleration, even if there is no change in velocity. Just as the moon is accelerating around the Earth. I always liked physics, just when it got into electro-magnetics, it was over my head.

 

[ra]

That looks correct from what I remember, but what does the big G stand for.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_constant

 

[CT Saints Fan]

That looks correct from what I remember, but what does the big G stand for.

Big G is for Grouch

 

[ClayT101]

I figured it was a constant.

 

[SWJJ]

I thought the BIG G was someone from kennabrah

 

[soupcan dan]

omg, i just fell for ra real hard.

 

[DCSaints_Fan]

Assuming the satellite is geosynchronous (not moving with respect to the earth's rotation)

f = GmM/r^2

ma = GmM/r^2

divide by m

a = GM/r^2

Look up G and M, r is the distance to the surface + the radius of the earth (offhand I don't know if its significant). Mass of the satellite is irrelevant because it was cancelled by division.

If its not geosynchrnous, you don't have enough information (need the speed of the satellite)

I figured it was a constant.

The acceleration is constant, but only near the surface of the earth is it close to 9.8 m/s^2 (or 32 feet/s^2)

 

[DCSaints_Fan]

Actually it doesn't have to be geosynchronous, but it couldn't have artificial means of thrust, which satellites don't (except for brief periods for adjustment), and I mixed up geosynchronous with geostationary. Been a long time since that college physics course ...

actually i think as the orbit decays it begins to fall to the earth shortening its orbit length and causing it to increase in speed....
just a thought. no facts to back it up...

In real satellites, the orbit does decay, but we're ignoring that affect.