Optimistic Ozzy
Bleeder of Black and Gold
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2003
- Messages
- 11,678
- Reaction score
- 16,274
Offline
No
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't see it as contradictory, but more like qualified or with caveats.Touché so he offered contradictory takes. One that Ward was worthy of the #1 pick but also that his warts may never improve.
If you count QB as a need, then we basically need help everywhere.
Every possibility is on the table.
Ward got sacked a lot at as a junior at Washington St. and had a fumbling problem because his OL was pretty bad. Last year at Miami his OL was much better, he had very few sacks and he cut down on all those fumbles. It tells me he can improve with better coaching and having a good OL also helped.I don't see it as contradictory, but more like qualified or with caveats.
His arm stood out from the others who worked outMore folks are talking about the kid from Louisville; he seems to be this year's Penix/Nix with 7 years of college and injury history.
I'll go with Cosell's opinion --passListened to Greg Cosell’s opinion of him on a podcast yesterday. He basically hates him.
Here's Cam Ward's sack rates broken out by school:Ward got sacked a lot at as a junior at Washington St. and had a fumbling problem because his OL was pretty bad. Last year at Miami his OL was much better, he had very few sacks and he cut down on all those fumbles. It tells me he can improve with better coaching and having a good OL also helped.
YEAR | TEAM | ATT | SACK | SACK RATE |
2020 | UIW | 303 | 17 | 5.61% |
2021 | UIW | 590 | 33 | 5.59% |
TOTAL | | 893 | 50 | 5.60% |
| | | | |
2022 | WSU | 497 | 46 | 9.26% |
2023 | WSU | 485 | 38 | 7.84% |
TOTAL | | 982 | 84 | 8.55% |
| | | | |
2024 | MIA | 454 | 22 | 4.85% |
Would y'all take a chance on him in the 4th or 5th round?
Thanks for the statistical breakdown. As a fan of Miami I can tell you he had quite a few of us fans frustrated because he refused to check down and kept looking to make a big play. He’s an absolute play maker but he could’ve dumped it off so that is something he’ll need to work on.Here's Cam Ward's sack rates broken out by school:
YEAR TEAM ATT SACK SACK RATE 2020 UIW 303 17 5.61% 2021 UIW 590 33 5.59% TOTAL 893 50 5.60% 2022 WSU 497 46 9.26% 2023 WSU 485 38 7.84% TOTAL 982 84 8.55% 2024 MIA 454 22 4.85%
Cam got sacked at a high rate both of his years at WSU. At Miami he got sacked about 1 out of every 20 pass attempts. In a game, that's about once every 2 to 3 drives. Sacks like holding calls, tend to kill drives, so it's at least a concern.
The pertinent question is which school did he play at that most mirrors the pressure he'll be under in the NFL?
Greg Cosell pointed out that a clean pocket in college is bigger and less congested than a clean pocket in the NFL. That's why some QB's who are great in college struggle in the NFL. It's also why some solid QB's in college end up doing better in the NFL than some of the QB's that were better than them in college. A QB is under more pressure in a clean NFL pocket than in a clean college pocket. It's more compact in the NFL and there's more congestion.
Getting sacked is mostly a result of a QB either not being aware of how much time they have to get rid of the ball or not accepting when they have to get rid of the ball. The average time for a QB to throw in the NFL is shorter than the average time to throw in college. If the average time to throw Ward got at Washington was close to the NFL average time to throw and the time he had to throw at Miami was longer than the NFL average, then his NFL sack rate might be closer to what it was at Washington than at Miami.
I couldn't find any stats on the average time he had to throw the ball each year.
Were is the guarantee we will be in the running for a top signal caller next year? when was the last time the Saints or any team that has not been a perennial loser been in position to draft#1 or #2 where the top signal caller typically goes?I have little confidence in Haener, and if Ewers is there in the 5th - if he's the BPA, fine.
Rattler - maybe, but I don't think he's the future either.
Isn't next year's QB depth supposed to be better?
Were is the guarantee we will be in the running for a top signal caller next year? when was the last time the Saints or any team that has not been a perennial loser been in position to draft#1 or #2 where the top signal caller typically goes?