RB

Joined
Jul 9, 2003
Messages
2,885
Ratings
2,937
Age
36
Location
Austin
Offline
Its weird, but if Reggie had sprained his ankle a month ago, I think that is all that the board would talk about. But I have hardly heard much about it. I am guessing it is because overall he hasn't been much of a factor the past few games. It sucks if he loses any time but I don't feel like he is the centerpiece of our offense like I once did. Nevertheless, lets hope he is back ASAP. We need all our horses if we are going to make a playoff run this season.
 

LSSpam

Practice Squad
Joined
Jun 2, 2002
Messages
28,423
Ratings
8,136
Age
36
Location
Oxford, MS
Offline
Yet he had a terrible game and we lost big.

Things that make you go hmmmmm. :scratch:

Not minimizing Reggie as a factor, but he played the whole game, we lost because of things that had nothing to do with Reggie, namely picks he wasn't involved in, missed interceptions on a defense he doesn't play on, and some freaky plays in general he had nothing to do with.
 

Puntz

Hall-of-Famer
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
4,681
Ratings
1,136
Offline
Not minimizing Reggie as a factor, but he played the whole game, we lost because of things that had nothing to do with Reggie, namely picks he wasn't involved in, missed interceptions on a defense he doesn't play on, and some freaky plays in general he had nothing to do with.
well, 2 of the TO's directly resulted from his touches..but i agree the whole team was dragging today
 

dninc

Super Forum Fanatic
Joined
Nov 8, 2003
Messages
9,594
Age
39
Location
Tampa, Fl
Offline
Not minimizing Reggie as a factor, but he played the whole game, we lost because of things that had nothing to do with Reggie, namely picks he wasn't involved in, missed interceptions on a defense he doesn't play on, and some freaky plays in general he had nothing to do with.

Umm didn't reggie throw a int?
 

Condor 63

Saints Fan ®
Joined
Jun 7, 1999
Messages
8,044
Ratings
130
Location
Birmingham, Alabama
Offline
Not minimizing Reggie as a factor, but he played the whole game, we lost because of things that had nothing to do with Reggie, namely picks he wasn't involved in, missed interceptions on a defense he doesn't play on, and some freaky plays in general he had nothing to do with.
I never said otherwise. Reggie having a not particuarly great game had nothing to do with the defense and if I had to point fingers I'd point them that way.

Reggie didn't have a great game though and frequently he plays a part in third downs which means first downs which means ball control. What that means is had Reggie a better game it is just possible we might have kept the Ravens O on the sideline more. My point was that Reggie is a big part of this offense in ways that are not always so obvious.

That is not to say he can do much about most interceptions and a swiss cheese defense.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.




Saints Headlines (The Advocate)

Headlines

Top Bottom