- Joined
- Jun 6, 2010
- Messages
- 14,037
- Reaction score
- 22,086
Offline
So if we aren’t pushing any of his money forward then he’s off the books after next year right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Still cap savings when cut next season, even more if designated June 1
No void years added, they would have had to do a new contract. Sounds like they just went ahead and did the simple restructure that they bake into every contractIf they aren't adding any void years, then it's better than the alternative.
It's just him being confusing. He's using "push money forward" to mean void years. The money is all still within the framework of the original deal.How do we save $30million without pushing it out to the future?
Carr could have agreed to add void years without new dollars, it would be a poor look for him to not do that for the team.No void years added, they would have had to do a new contract. Sounds like they just went ahead and did the simple restructure that they bake into every contract
Will definitely be designated post 6/1. So half of that will hit the cap in 2026, half in 2027.
This was always the most likely scenario.
Denial, that's all. Most of us knew this was coming. Thanks Mick.Where’s everyone that was giving mebc I said he wasn’t taking a pay cut lol
When someone tells you who they are……believe them.Denial, that's all. Most of us knew this was coming. Thanks Mick.
Carr’s contract has void years through 2029, so we should get the max savings in 2025 from the restructure. I don’t think the team can choose to spread the hit out over fewer than five years if he has five total years (real + void) remaining on his deal.It's just him being confusing. He's using "push money forward" to mean void years. The money is all still within the framework of the original deal.
Next year, he can be cut with some savings and we are done. No lingering effects.