Simms Ranks Winston At 26 (1 Viewer)

[Saint Jack]

 

[ndcc]

Welp, that settles that- - coming from one of the great NFL QB's of all time: Chris Sims...

...oh, wait...

 

[Madmarsha]

Look, I'm positive even Chris Simms' dog doesn't take him seriously.

Simms: Sit, Fido.
Fido:

 

[Corey504]

I rank simms a lot worse as a media personality so it's cool.

 

[SWJJ]

great segment!

i'm pumped for this season!

Winston gonna BALL!

 

[Saint Droopy]

I don't have a problem with Simms ranking him where he did. I love it. More fuel for Jaboo. Until he goes out there and lights up the NFL no one will respect Jameis. There are Saints fans that he still needs to win over (many here on SR). I think JW... with his new weapons... will kill it this year. I just hope the Oline can stay healthy and protect him.

 

[Taker597]

Simms really a Baker Stan. Had him 13th last year. Have him above Winston this year too. Lol

 

[Consigliere]

At least Simms is consistent. Hopefully Winston will be as bad as Simms said Brees was.

 

[Maik Jeaunz]

 

[dvdman]

If Tom Brady was ranking them then I take it seriously but really Chris Simms is only known because
his dad quarterbacked for the Giants. What are this guy's credentials and what can he hang his hat on?

 

[Spec]

That's great for Jameis! Chris Simms is one of the worst analysts in pro sports. The opposite of his opinion is usually spot on.

 

[MV2]

Simms is an idiot. He couldn't play the position but knows what others should be doing. That's why I don't listen to talking heads.

 

[Crzycjunx76]

Simms being down on a QB is a ringing endorsement. I remember he was breaking down a play once, and said something to the effect of: "The pass was completed for the first down, but the correct read was..." and proceeded to point out a deeper target that was bracketed but had a little space.

I just remember being struck with the thought of "That is why you are in the studio and not on the field Chris".

 

[El Caliente]

Simms being down on a QB is a ringing endorsement. I remember he was breaking down a play once, and said something to the effect of: "The pass was completed for the first down, but the correct read was..." and proceeded to point out a deeper target that was bracketed but had a little space.

I just remember being struck with the thought of "That is why you are in the studio and not on the field Chris".

TBF, I have seen Rev say the same thing when breaking down a Taysom Hill throw.

There is always a better throw out there (if the one being discussed doesn’t end in a touchdown).

 

[Taker597]

Simms being down on a QB is a ringing endorsement. I remember he was breaking down a play once, and said something to the effect of: "The pass was completed for the first down, but the correct read was..." and proceeded to point out a deeper target that was bracketed but had a little space.

I just remember being struck with the thought of "That is why you are in the studio and not on the field Chris".

I don't like when arm chair scouts try to explain correct reads. A correct read should always be looked as a positive play.. Especially, one that moves the chains. There happens to be "Better" reads is the correct terminology. Rarely does a an easy positive play can be called a wrong or even bad read. Especially, when a deep ball is a lot more complicated than "Oh he should of thrown here"

My question is "Can he throw here?" After watching Taysom and end of career Brees. You can't just speak into existence arm talent that's clearly not there.