So who's part of the 29%? (1 Viewer)

Exactly why I think Bush has near zero political gravitas or credibility.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070616/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush

So NOW he threatens with the veto pen "runaway" spending? Pot meet kettle, kettle meet pot. How stupid does he think the American people are? Tax and spend policies? As opposed to borrow and spend?

How many times did he express runaway gov't spending when Republicans were in power? Not. one. peep. of a threatened veto. FWIW, I'm glad he's trying to return to some semblance of fiscal responsibility, but obviously this grandstanding is more of a dog and pony show.

I think he left Congress alone as long as they left him alone in the war on terror. He is in trouble with a lot of his base for letting his Republican congress spend like drunken sailors.
 
Saintmdterps, we've had this discussion frequently in the past year, particularly in relation to the "Worst President Ever" tag, which you'll recall was a MoveOn.org slogan and bumpersticker for the 2004 election.

As Gumbeau pointed out, there's so much we do not know at this point that it's most definitely wrong to draw valid conclusions at this point.

For a few samples, we don't have to look very far.

FDR had polio and couldn't walk without assistance, but any cameraman taking a picture of FDR in his wheelchair quickly got his camera (and his arm) broken by the Secret Service. It was long after his death before pictures emerged of him being carried around, loaded and unloaded from cars and trains. The American public that voted for him didn't have a clue at the time.

The press corps was well-aware of JFK's dalliances with Marilyn Monroe in the White House, but he was dead for 20 years before that information saw the light of day.

We are still in the process of declassifying the deaths of Air Force crews that were shot down spying on Russia in the 1950s and 1960s. That only happened after evidence began emerging in Russia that they captured some of those men and they eventually died in prison in Siberia.

Lyndon Johnson created the Tonkin Gulf Incident which led to a 98-2 Senate vote to authorize the use of force in Vietnam. It would be 30 years before the information was declassified to reveal that the entire incident was a CIA operation.

Why wouldn't we declassify all the documents on 9/11? Well, to answer that, we'd have to know what operations were being run from offices in the World Trade Center, wouldn't we?

If the operations are still classified, the locations of those offices are still classified and so are the documents relating to 9/11 that refer to those offices and even the names of the people who worked in them.

Did you know that there are certain military courses which issue you a new Social Security Number when you graduate? :)
DD I see where you're coming from. I think what you say may certainly be appropriate with regard to foreign policy. I'm just not sure here at home. It appears to me at this point in time that he does not have the avereage american's interests at heart when he makes his decisions, to the extent they ARE HIS to make.

He is not a person for whom it is easy to feel symapathy, but as you say, it may be appropriate to let some time pass before tagging him with worst president ever. I'm sure additional facts will come to light after he has departed the white house.

When I make a decision, I do not bear the weight of 300 million people on my shoulders, however, I must be able to look myself in the eye and respect who I see. there have been times certainly I have been unable to do that. I think I've learned from my mistakes and become a better person. With regard to Dubya's choices, only he can answer whether or not his choices have been made with the best intentions.

I appreciate what you said in your later post re: Churchill and Ultra. Sometimes, hard decisions must be made in order to serve the greater good, I believe similar choices were made in the Pacific so the Japanese would not know we had cracked their code. As long as I feel a greater good IS ultimately served, I can live with the rationale of these choices. Back to Bush, only time will tell.

I did NOT know that about military courses and SSN's:winknudge:
 
Hard to argue with somebody who has "the ravens are pond scum" under their avatar. :hihi:
 
Or slipping bimbos in and out of the White House or sneaking into bed after a secret rendevous.
Philandering in the white house is certainly nothing new. As a matter of fact, the two may be synonymous. Typical politicians.
 
When it comes to foreign policy and wars, I try to temper my disagreements with the knowledge that I don't (and maybe will never) know the whole story. I can disagree with Iraq based on my limited knowledge and what I see as a strategic blunder. Maybe in my lifetime I'll learn the whole truth...maybe not.

But on domestic issues I can and will take Bush to task. His failures handling Katrina (and I lay respective blame at the foot of all involved), "the Wall", no "mission to the moon" type of program for alternative fuels, pushing for the "Patriot" Act, creation of the Department of Homeland Security, etc., etc., etc. There's plenty of areas where, IMHO, he's failed miserably as Chief Executive of the US.
 
How soon we forget...

PBS
Nixon Tries Price Controls
Excerpt from The Commanding Heights by Daniel Yergin and Joseph Stanislaw, 1997 ed., pp. 60-64


[Following the Kennedy-Johnson administration in the United States, there was a massive effort to manage the marketplace, in part by controlling wages.] This initiative was not the handiwork of left-wing liberals but of the administration of Richard Nixon, a moderately conservative Republican who was a critic of government intervention in the economy.

READ MORE
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/shared/minitextlo/ess_nixongold.html

Let's also remember that it was Nixon, a "conservative", who removed the gold standard, which IMHO was what accelerated the financial mess of the late 70s that was blamed on Carter. I'm not saying Carter was a great President (but he wasn't the worst by far), just that he gets an unfair rap for the economic mess that was largely the fault of Nixon's moves.
 
>>Originally Posted by Saint Anthony
You would age like that to if you had to wake up and look at Hillary every morning :hihi:

Pretty lame there, IMHO. Unless you can prove you're waking up to something better looking, you probably shouldn't be dissing on a woman who turns 60 this year. I agree she's not all that great (overbite and such), but it's pretty cheesy that the VRWC is still getting play nearly 6 and a half years after Clinton left office. Correct me if I'm wrong, but certainly Hillary > Barbara. And Laura isn't any kind of take-home prize either (though clearly people aren't cheap-shotting her on her looks).

100% lame bra.

TPS
 
Wow, you must really LOVE Hillary to have your feelings hurt on a joke.

100% square

....And yes my wife is way more beautiful and will be way more beautiful at the age of sixty. So there, Mr no fun.
 
>>Wow, you must really LOVE Hillary to have your feelings hurt on a joke.

Actually I think she's a lightning rod. I didn't vote for her husband and only would vote for her if she was running against W or his equivalent.

>>100% square

Nice. But you don't know.

>>....And yes my wife is way more beautiful and will be way more beautiful at the age of sixty. So there, Mr no fun.

Congratulations.

TPS
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Twitter

    Back
    Top Bottom