- Joined
- Jul 8, 2000
- Messages
- 23,316
- Reaction score
- 46,421
- Age
- 44
Online
I honestly do not see how this test has any bearing on what kind of players they will be, what kind of learning capacity they have, how much passion and hard work they will put into learning, ect. I scored a 32 on my ACT while drunk, didn't even finish the individual tests becuase I ran out of time. Thats 32 out of 36. I also scored a 1330 on the SAT. I went to LSU on acedemic sholarship, stayed drunk, and quit. My wife scored a 26 on the ACT and had to work her butt off all through high school and college, but she now has a college degree in computer animation.
My point is that standardized tests, especially those as broad as the wonderlick, do not tell you very much about a person. A low score does not mean the person is dumb and has no learning capacity. It just means he processes things differently, not all smart people do well on standardized tests. Some idiots score off the charts. The test is overrated by the media, and FO's don't give it much credence. I honestly, and many GM's share this sentiment, do not know why they still give the test. The combine in general needs to be reevaluated and it is ******** up that these scores are being released
Its really just a test to see how quickly your brain can analyze things. Its not meant to be a football test...Its just a test to see how fast you can think. Its a particularly good tool for QB evaluation.
To learn an NFL playbook, you have to be able to process information quickly. Like you said though, some people process things differently and sometimes the test is a false indication.