Offline
So.. where do you think the Broncos will finish this year? I know the bears cant think Bullocks is their answer at safety.. Taylor Mays perhaps? I see Denver finishing with a pretty bad record..
Hopefully behind the Raiders!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So.. where do you think the Broncos will finish this year? I know the bears cant think Bullocks is their answer at safety.. Taylor Mays perhaps? I see Denver finishing with a pretty bad record..
There are conflicting reports then because Clayton is saying 2 1st's and Orton for Cutler and a 3rd.
That doesn't make the trade right.
I would consider a 1st, 4th, and Orton a fair deal...I think they paid too much. I think Orton will play a little better in Denver, and I think Cutler will play a little worse in Chicago.
I seriously doubt it! You must think Cutler is just that good. Who's he gonna throw to? Who's gonna compliment Matt Forte. Besides Rickey Manning Jr., and Brian Urlacher, who are they gonna scare with their defense? Nothing in Chicago screams, "hey world, we are getting better"!
Cutler has only proven one thing thus far, and that's Cutler having huge arm strength. Yeah I know he threw for over 4,000 yards before, and made a ProBowl, IMO by default. ProBowl really doesn't mean much anymore. Too many really good atheletes get snubbed...ala Brees
Jay Cutler=Aaron Brooks
Strong arm, horrible mechanics, non-leader!
There aren't more than 5 guys in the league that I'd give up two 1st rounders for, and Jay Cutler isn't anywhere near that list. Way too much given up by the Bears.
John Clayton is a conflicting report. Once he gets himself straightened out, he'll report the right terms of the trade.
Clayton was just on the radio here and said that the deal was Orton, this year's first and third and next year's first to Denver for Cutler and this year's fifth.
lus-un2:
lus-un2:
lus-un2:
lus-un2:
lus-un2:
lus-un2:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4037373He changed his story then b/c thats not what he said earlier.