ChadC
ALL-MADDEN TEAM
Offline
Dude thanks so much for Vilma!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
...be suprosed if he did. the jets hit brady 33 times in the pats game. more then half teh times he dropped back to pass. thats messes with a Qbs rhythm and brees is all about rhythm
....moore and henderson are gogint o have to come up huge.
not at all. you guys have been great here. i've been on boards where my name alone would get me banned. seriously.
and i see what your saying, houston had a weak D, and tennesee has a weak pass game. but NE is a complete team. they have a run game (as proved last week against ATL) they have a pass game (brady to moss) and the have a defense (belicheck is one of the best defensive minds in the game) they scard me more then you guys. not for talent but because belicheck can really get to a rookie QB and confuse him. peyton manning (my opinoin the best QB in teh league) admitted it took him 5 years to figure out NEs defense. you guys have more talent then the pats, but i don't think your scheme will get to sanchez.
still i can see the jets lsoing this game. after you guys we have 3 easy one's coming and who would think the jets can go 7-0? 6-1 is more realitic lol. and brees scares me. he is teh hottest QB in the league right now. i can be a 1000 yard WR with him throwing to me.
I seen brees on the TV show sports science and he is more accurate then an olympic archer.
Dude thanks so much for Vilma!!!
Ok, here we go:
sup⋅prose <script language="javascript">AC_FL_RunContent = 0;</script><script type="text/javascript">var interfaceflash = new LEXICOFlashObject ( "http://cache.lexico.com/d/g/speaker.swf", "speaker", "17", "15", "<img src=\"http://cache.lexico.com/g/d/speaker.gif\" border=\"0\" />", "6");interfaceflash.addParam("loop", "false");interfaceflash.addParam("quality", "high");interfaceflash.addParam("menu", "false");interfaceflash.addParam("salign", "t");interfaceflash.addParam("FlashVars", "soundUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.lexico.com%2Fdictionary%2Faudio%2Fluna%2FS11%2FS1146800.mp3&clkLogProxyUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fdictionary.reference.com%2Fwhatzup.html&t=a&d=d&s=di&c=a&ti=1&ai=51359&l=dir&o=0&sv=00000000&ip=45684de1&u=audio"); interfaceflash.addParam('wmode','transparent');interfaceflash.write();</script><object id="speaker" codebase="codebase=" classid="clsid<img" src="images/smilies/biggrin.gif" alt="" title="Big Grin" smilieid="3" class="inlineimg" border="0">27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000 width=17 align=textTop height=15 http: fpdownload.macromedia.com pub shockwave cabs flash swflash.cab#version='6,0,0,0"'>
</object><noscript></noscript> /səˈproʊz/ [suh-prohz] verb, -posed, -piece of work⋅ing.
–verb (used with object) <table class="luna-Ent"><tbody><tr><td class="dnindex" width="35">1.</td><td>to assume (something), as for the sake of argument or as part of a proposition or theory that is absolutely and completely ridiculous and preposterous. Usually the trappings of an insane and unstable mind: I Suppose that the Jets' defense can stop the Saints' offense. </td></tr></tbody></table><table class="luna-Ent"><tbody><tr><td class="dnindex" width="35">2.</td><td>to consider (something) as a possibility suggested or an idea or plan proposed literally by East Coast maniacs who have snapped their connection to reality: Suppose we go to the Superdome and expect our team to prevail this Sunday. </td></tr></tbody></table>
gogint /go-gɪnt/ [go gint] <script language="javascript">AC_FL_RunContent = 0;</script><script type="text/javascript">var interfaceflash = new LEXICOFlashObject ( "http://cache.lexico.com/d/g/speaker.swf", "speaker", "17", "15", "<img src=\"http://cache.lexico.com/g/d/speaker.gif\" border=\"0\" />", "6");interfaceflash.addParam("loop", "false");interfaceflash.addParam("quality", "high");interfaceflash.addParam("menu", "false");interfaceflash.addParam("salign", "t");interfaceflash.addParam("FlashVars", "soundUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fcache.lexico.com%2Fdictionary%2Faudio%2Fluna%2FG02%2FG0250300.mp3&clkLogProxyUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fdictionary.reference.com%2Fwhatzup.html&t=a&d=d&s=di&c=a&ti=1&ai=51359&l=dir&o=0&sv=00000000&ip=45684de1&u=audio"); interfaceflash.addParam('wmode','transparent');interfaceflash.write();</script><object id="speaker" codebase="codebase=" classid="clsid<img" src="images/smilies/biggrin.gif" alt="" title="Big Grin" smilieid="3" class="inlineimg" border="0">27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000 width=17 align=textTop height=15 http: fpdownload.macromedia.com pub shockwave cabs flash swflash.cab#version='6,0,0,0"'>
</object><noscript></noscript> /goʊ gent/ [goh gint]/gɔn gent, gɒn gent/ [gawn, gon]
–verb <table class="luna-Ent"><tbody><tr><td class="dnindex" width="35">1.</td><td>The act of having your green hiney peeled like an onion or an apple by a superior force, as in the Saints. We went to New Orleans and got gogint in the Superdome.</td></tr></tbody></table>
–adjective <table class="luna-Ent"><tbody><tr><td class="dnindex" width="35">2.</td><td>departed; left after having your butt whipped to creamy post chewed pieces.</td></tr></tbody></table><table class="luna-Ent"><tbody><tr><td class="dnindex" width="35">3.</td><td>lost or hopeless endeavor, usually undertaken on Sundays in a domelike structure where the noise from the homebase is deafening.</td></tr></tbody></table>
i don't think your scheme will get to sanchez.
I think if you take your homer glasses off for a minute (I know it's hard to do - I have a problem with it, as well), the Pats team you guys played earlier were not the complete Pats team everyone expected (07' version) - Brady was clearly not himself, and I give you guys some of the credit for that... But he was also missing his security blanket (Welker), and it was in your house - BIG DIFFERENCE , Jets advantage.
The Saints team you play Sunday are better than the Pats right now, better than the Titans, and it's in our house.
I think if you take your homer glasses off for a minute (I know it's hard to do - I have a problem with it, as well), the Pats team you guys played earlier were not the complete Pats team everyone expected (07' version) - Brady was clearly not himself, and I give you guys some of the credit for that... But he was also missing his security blanket (Welker), and it was in your house - BIG DIFFERENCE , Jets advantage.
The Saints team you play Sunday are better than the Pats right now, better than the Titans, and it's in our house.
You may have had an argument with that before last Sunday, but if you watch what Gregg William's D did to Edwards in his own house, you may want to rethink that. The great part is, we'll both see come Sunday.
I totally agree with you. You guys are the best team were facing so far. you'll get no argument there. But if you be subjective, what would worry you more?
1) your rookie QB against a defnese peyton manning took 5 years to figure out
2) having a top 5 defense and needing to stop a top 5 offense?
i have more faith in my defense then a do in a rookie QB. And if sanchez could play that well against a belicheck defense, i'm not worried what he will do against the saints defense.
everyonr has one and they stink. just like *******s
we've played edwards for like 3 years now. he sucks. i mean he is not even a starting caliber QB in the NFL. I'd take sanchez right now over edwards to lead my team if i had to pick 1 QB for 1 game right now in there career.