16-year old goes to pick up his siblings; ends up getting shot at the wrong address (4 Viewers)

I’d argue you’re using a status quo position- usury is fine when a bank does it and bad when a loan shark does it, even though the bank is legally allowed to do much more damage
That's simply not true. Loan sharks typically will charge the maximum rates, and even more in certain situations. Banks ordinarily will not even offer their services to the highest risk individuals.

Now depending on the bank, some have had discriminatory loan practices and such, but loan sharks are significantly worse in just about every metric.

And I don't even like banks.
 
@Semper -

What about Martin Shkreli?

The pharma bro who knowing raised the price of the life saving drugs from like $50 a pill to like $2500 after he acquires the company. Then got popped for securities fraud and spent 7 years in jail. Lots of people died who couldn’t afford his medicine. He knew it and acknowledged it.

Death sentence?
So many bullets
 
That's simply not true. Loan sharks typically will charge the maximum rates, and even more in certain situations. Banks ordinarily will not even offer their services to the highest risk individuals.

Now depending on the bank, some have had discriminatory loan practices and such, but loan sharks are significantly worse in just about every metric.

And I don't even like banks.
Payday lenders, better?
 
He pointed out what appears to be a blind spot for ya.

Tobacco, alcohol etc are all bad for ya and do damage as much as illicit drugs can. Users of both do it despite your own admission they know it's bad for them, so that doesn't really factor.

Causing a death over the course of years is still considered murder is it not? A wife slowing poisoning her husband is held accountable. So why not businesses and people who knowingly sell harmful products?

Do they get to stay because of a grandfather clause? If so, then why is marijuana now fighting to become legal?

The system is a lot more complex than you want to admit. It's easy to take a position when you simplify the choices to just what you want to address like you have, but it doesn't help others who are looking at the whole system and really want to fix it.
I should have just let you say it - much simpler than what I wrote
 
@Semper -

What about Martin Shkreli?

The pharma bro who knowing raised the price of the life saving drugs from like $50 a pill to like $2500 after he acquires the company. Then got popped for securities fraud and spent 7 years in jail. Lots of people died who couldn’t afford his medicine. He knew it and acknowledged it.

Death sentence?
Yes please. Absolutely.
 



Relatively recent wouldn't you agree?
Well, relative to that, sure, but I don't think that's relevant to the discussion. We're talking about corporate liability, which is also relatively new if you want to use that metric.
 
Well considering black people can't even run away from racists, I'd say it's pretty known in black circles that you can't brandish anything. Ask Tamir Rice.
Tamir Rice is exactly who I thought of.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom