16-year old goes to pick up his siblings; ends up getting shot at the wrong address (3 Viewers)

Well, relative to that, sure, but I don't think that's relevant to the discussion. We're talking about corporate liability, which is also relatively new if you want to use that metric.
Seems we've had the concept of corporations for close to half of the time we've had tobacco use.

The word "corporation" derives from corpus, the Latin word for body, or a "body of people". By the time of Justinian (reigned 527–565), Roman law recognized a range of corporate entities under the names Universitas, corpus or collegium. Following the passage of the Lex Julia during the reign of Julius Caesar as Consul and Dictator of the Roman Republic (49–44 BC), and their reaffirmation during the reign of Caesar Augustus as Princeps senatus and Imperator of the Roman Army (27 BC–14 AD), collegia required the approval of the Roman Senate or the Emperor in order to be authorized as legal bodies.[8] These included the state itself (the Populus Romanus), municipalities, and such private associations as sponsors of a religious cult, burial clubs, political groups, and guilds of craftsmen or traders. Such bodies commonly had the right to own property and make contracts, to receive gifts and legacies, to sue and be sued, and, in general, to perform legal acts through representatives.[9] Private associations were granted designated privileges and liberties by the emperor.[10]

The concept of the corporation was revived in the Middle Ages with the recovery and annotation of Justinian's Corpus Juris Civilis by the glossators and their successors the commentators in the 11th–14th centuries. Particularly important in this respect were the Italian jurists Bartolus de Saxoferrato and Baldus de Ubaldis, the latter of whom connected the corporation to the metaphor of the body politic to describe the state.[11][12]

Early entities which carried on business and were the subjects of legal rights included the collegium of ancient Rome and the sreni of the Maurya Empire in ancient India.[13] In medieval Europe, churches became incorporated, as did local governments, such as the City of London Corporation. The point was that the incorporation would survive longer than the lives of any particular member, existing in perpetuity. The alleged oldest commercial corporation in the world, the Stora Kopparberg mining community in Falun, Sweden, obtained a charter from King Magnus Eriksson in 1347.

 
Simple they have proven they don’t care for the sanctity of another persons life, that persons family or that persons friends. They have taken everything from a mother, father, child, brother. Why do they get to live? To rethink their ways? I also hear about how much money it costs and that’s a bullshirt line. It’s expensive because we choose to make it expensive. We choose to house the separately on death row for 20+ years while they appeal etc. This racist piece of garbage took a woman’s life. In front of her children. They will never forget that or be the same again. We know she is guilty. Move her to the top of the ticket and put her on trial. She loses death penalty. She wants to appeal. Fine that’s next week. Guilty again you die tomorrow. Why are we over complicating things?

I think the issue is "what if you get it wrong?"

Like, how many people have been found guilty in a court of law, sentenced to death row, only to be found innocent later via DNA or the sole witness recanting, etc?
 
Ralph Yarl, the Kansas City teenager who was shot after going to the wrong house to pick up his siblings, has described his ordeal.

Speaking to ABC’s Good Morning America on Tuesday, Yarl, who is Black, said he thought there was no way that the white man pointing the gun at him through the glass door would shoot him.

But Yarl, who was looking for his younger brothers, was wrong a second time.

Yarl’s brothers were actually at a home a block away. Describing the April incident, he told the ABC anchor Robin Roberts he hadn’t met the family of his brothers’ friends, “so maybe it was their house”.

After ringing the doorbell, he said, he waited a long time on the porch before the door opened.

“I see this old man and I’m saying, ‘Oh, this must be like, their grandpa,’” said Yarl, who is now 17. “And then he pulls out his gun. And I’m like, ‘Whoa!’ So I like, back up. He points it at me.”

Yarl braced and turned his head.

“And then it happened, and then I’m on the ground. I fall on the glass, the shattered glass”, and “then before I know it, I’m running away, shouting, ’Help me! Help me!’”

Yarl was bleeding. He said he wondered how it was possible he had been shot in the head. The man he had never met before said only five words, he said: “Don’t come here ever again.”

Andrew Lester, 84, has pleaded not guilty to first-degree assault and armed criminal action.

Lester said he shot Yarl through the door without warning because he was “scared to death” he was about to be robbed. He remains free after posting $20,000 – 10% of his $200,000 bond.

The shooting drew international attention amid claims Lester received preferential treatment. Joe Biden and several celebrities called for justice. Yarl’s attorney, Lee Merritt, has called for the shooting to be investigated as a hate crime.

Yarl’s mother, Cleo Nagbe, told ABC she got a call from police, telling her about the shooting. In hospital, he was partially alert. Ten weeks later, Yarl said he has headaches and trouble sleeping and sometimes his mind is foggy.

“You’re looking at a kid that took the SAT when he was in eighth grade and now his brain is slowed,” Nagbe said. “So physically he looks fine. But there’s a lot that has been taken from him.”……..

 
Ralph Yarl, the Kansas City teenager who was shot after going to the wrong house to pick up his siblings, has described his ordeal.

Speaking to ABC’s Good Morning America on Tuesday, Yarl, who is Black, said he thought there was no way that the white man pointing the gun at him through the glass door would shoot him.

But Yarl, who was looking for his younger brothers, was wrong a second time.

Yarl’s brothers were actually at a home a block away. Describing the April incident, he told the ABC anchor Robin Roberts he hadn’t met the family of his brothers’ friends, “so maybe it was their house”.

After ringing the doorbell, he said, he waited a long time on the porch before the door opened.

“I see this old man and I’m saying, ‘Oh, this must be like, their grandpa,’” said Yarl, who is now 17. “And then he pulls out his gun. And I’m like, ‘Whoa!’ So I like, back up. He points it at me.”

Yarl braced and turned his head.

“And then it happened, and then I’m on the ground. I fall on the glass, the shattered glass”, and “then before I know it, I’m running away, shouting, ’Help me! Help me!’”

Yarl was bleeding. He said he wondered how it was possible he had been shot in the head. The man he had never met before said only five words, he said: “Don’t come here ever again.”

Andrew Lester, 84, has pleaded not guilty to first-degree assault and armed criminal action.

Lester said he shot Yarl through the door without warning because he was “scared to death” he was about to be robbed. He remains free after posting $20,000 – 10% of his $200,000 bond.

The shooting drew international attention amid claims Lester received preferential treatment. Joe Biden and several celebrities called for justice. Yarl’s attorney, Lee Merritt, has called for the shooting to be investigated as a hate crime.

Yarl’s mother, Cleo Nagbe, told ABC she got a call from police, telling her about the shooting. In hospital, he was partially alert. Ten weeks later, Yarl said he has headaches and trouble sleeping and sometimes his mind is foggy.

“You’re looking at a kid that took the SAT when he was in eighth grade and now his brain is slowed,” Nagbe said. “So physically he looks fine. But there’s a lot that has been taken from him.”……..

I don't wish death on people, but this is one of those cases that makes me want to go there.
 
what a stupid, completely unnecessary inclusion in the story
Read fine to me.

I think it plays to what should be a natural reaction that knocking on the wrong door is no reason to shoot someone. To be wrong in that reaction means that there was a whacko at the door with a gun and bad intent.
 
Read fine to me.

I think it plays to what should be a natural reaction that knocking on the wrong door is no reason to shoot someone. To be wrong in that reaction means that there was a whacko at the door with a gun and bad intent.
It centers the story as if the kids actions caused what happened- the cause of the shooting is the shooter
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom