- Joined
- Jul 8, 2000
- Messages
- 27,195
- Reaction score
- 57,791
- Age
- 45
Offline
I think Hendrickson is also in that same category as Elliss and Davenport and to some extent Armstead. They all have had significant availability issues. Our being tight to the cap means we have to be more judicious in where our more limited money goes, and it absolutely cannot go to players who have a high risk of not being available. No doubt that factored into thinking then, as it does now.
Makes you wonder about Michael Thomas and the approach that will be taken with him, assuming someone else doesn't waft lotsa bills under his nose and takes a bet he'll be fine and pay him as such.
Agreed. I have made that point to him before also, but he chooses to ignore it.
We had a borderline Hall of Famer at one end spot, and had invested two firsts into Davenport, and had a reasonable belief that he was ascending and we'd have to pay him, so we opted not to give a big money deal to Hendrickson, whose only great year with us was his contract year.
I have used this line many times, but many people are confusing poor/regrettable personnel decisions with cap issues. And they're also confusing cap issues with UNPRECEDENTED GLOBAL PANDEMIC reeking havoc on our "living on the edge" plan at the exact wrong time, two years ago.