RazorOye
carry all the groceries in in one trip
VIP Subscribing Member
VIP Contributor
Gold VIP Contributor
Offline
So now teach in a school with a large AA population as well as a sizable Latin population
( If you don’t want to consider institutional poverty and disenfranchisement maybe stop here- but I don’t think you’re that guy)
- some of the newer Latin students are literal ‘walk across miles of dessert to get here’ type families
And let me tell you those parents are STUNNED that other Latin (and even AA) students aren’t super 100% grateful for the educational opportunity
And from their POV, of course, it’s tons better than whatever/wherever they left
For the students who are a few generations into the city, the disparity is what they see the most, and have many examples of people who tried hard but were not rewarded (not all obviously) and started to lose sight of the point
Now let’s take the immigrants that you’re talking about - let’s say there are 20 of them and they are all hard working- do you think all 20 will become successful?
I dont
I think there will be 3-5 doors that could open for the 20
20 will work very hard and 5 will succeed
The 15 left behind and the kids of those 15 will have a very different idea of the value of that original hard work
....
Last year I taught at one of the most privileged school in the city - the ostensible difference that I saw was access
One group starts the year telling me about their European trips (which I don’t begrudge them at all), the other about life guarding for NORD
It’s no hard to imagine which group will have more doors open for them
I have taught in juvenile prison. Taught in inner city. Taught in the 'burbs. Taught in rurality. Taught in a school that cost $35,000/year to the children of billionaires (families of Louis Vuitton, Bacardi, billionaires, major federal politicians, etc) and the stark difference in 'opportunity' - the disparity you talk about - goes so far, in so many ways.
It goes into places I never saw, never even imagined existed. And I'm probably still just scratching the surface.
I knew going in that the 'bootstraps' mentality was in part mythical, but never realized the demystification would be this profound.
I listened to a report about Iceland moving away from GDP as the top economic indicator and moving toward a "well being index"
Iceland puts well-being ahead of GDP in budget
The Nordic nation's PM says modern governments need to value green energy and family welfare more.
www.bbc.com
Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz is among several economists arguing that gross domestic product - measuring a country's production in goods and services - fails to capture the impact of climate change, inequality, digital services and other phenomena shaping modern societies.
I think something like "being poor" and all of the various causes, in their multiplicities, are things that should belong in this discussion