Could Derek Carr be a post-June 1 cut? (2 Viewers)

It would be better to keep him even if he is the number two guy. His cap hit would be easier and he is a great backup piece that becomes tradeable in the right situation.
It’s accurate when it says it’s cheaper to keep him but your not getting a better QB then him while we still have him or his cap hit.
 
It would be better to keep him even if he is the number two guy. His cap hit would be easier and he is a great backup piece that becomes tradeable in the right situation.
It’s accurate when it says it’s cheaper to keep him but your not getting a better QB then him while we still have him or his cap hit.
At this point getting the best QB is not the main concern, it's removing the cap issues as fast as possible. Keeping him means pushing $20-25M of his base salary into future years which is not cheaper. Considering the Saints cap situation it is likely the most feasible route though.
 
You can do as many post June 1st cuts as you want. However you can only do two cuts prior to June 1st while having them count as post-June 1st.

If we cut Carr, his dead cap is $50 m. If we designate. him post June 1st, then its spread out over two years, we would save $25m.
You don't get that savings until June 1st!
 
Carr is a middle tier starting quarterback. Carr is not the Saints problem. He is not the solution either. If you cut Carr you still have to draft or sign a QB. Too many other things need fixing.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Back
    Top Bottom