thehill.com
Meanwhile, in Illinois... The signholder has the gall to say 'I have Jewish friends'... FFS
Auschwitz Museum condemns Nazi slogan at ‘Re-open Illinois’ protest
The Auschwitz Museum and Memorial condemned a protester who brought a sign featuring the Nazi slogan “Arbeit macht frei” to a rally against Illinois’s stay-at-home orders.
Meanwhile, in Illinois... The signholder has the gall to say 'I have Jewish friends'... FFS this is repulsive...
Auschwitz Museum condemns Nazi slogan at ‘Re-open Illinois’ protest
The Auschwitz Museum and Memorial condemned a protester who brought a sign featuring the Nazi slogan “Arbeit macht frei” to a rally against Illinois’s stay-at-home orders.
Meanwhile, in Illinois... The signholder has the gall to say 'I have Jewish friends'... FFS this is repulsive...
Auschwitz Museum condemns Nazi slogan at ‘Re-open Illinois’ protest
The Auschwitz Museum and Memorial condemned a protester who brought a sign featuring the Nazi slogan “Arbeit macht frei” to a rally against Illinois’s stay-at-home orders.
With a Jewish governor of Illinois no less...
We spoke earlier about moving the goalposts with the purpose of lockdowns and restrictions. It was from the beginning supposed to be about allowing the healthcare infrastructure to gather it's capacity and not be overwhelmed. That's been accomplished. Well, if you listen to the city's administration, the restrictions now are about making sure no one gets sick at all, which means they won't really lift restrictions until there is a vaccine or herd immunity, which by the way can't happen if you try to prevent people from getting it altogether. This is utterly ridiculous and is heading towards a form of fascism. New Orleans is so screwed with this mayor. People need to begin to make their own decisions on this. If you want to ride it out at home go for it. Life otherwise has to go on. Her plans do not appear to be a workable solution at all and would have the majority of the population dependent on handouts while the city's economy is utterly destroyed. What's the over/under on the city doubling down again while the rest of the state lifts more restrictions on the 15th? We can't have people eating at tables outside or going to church you know.
New Orleans’ initial phase approach indicates no large gatherings before a vaccine, “widespread immunity”
With less than two weeks left in the New Orleans stay-at-home order, the administration released it's first steps for reopening parts of the city.www.fox8live.com
there is a convergence point for those 2 ideas
The phased approach using data trends is the method the White House has developed and is now encouraging - and I think many states, cities, and organizations using it to some degree.
I have needed to look at the White House plan to understand the re-opening plan for a large organization that I do legal work for . . . I have only been asked to spot (tort) liability concerns but I have reviewed the plans and they're based on (1) requiring case and test trends to hit certain metrics to get through the "gate" in to the next phase; (2) continued use of some mitigation measures - some in a sliding scale of impact - to protect the vulnerable groups that include the elderly and healthcare workers, and (3) monitoring the situation as a function of health-care capacity.
The New Orleans plan public website doesn't state the specific metrics (there probably is a more detailed plan that isn't on the site), but the White House plan includes, for example, that phase 1 cannot begin until there is a downward trajectory of documented cases within a 14-day period or a downward trajectory of positive tests as a percent of total tests within a 14-day period (flat or increasing volume of tests). And phase 1 is a limited opening, it's not a immediate return with a few casual measures still around.
I didn't watch her press conference but is that where you're getting the "zero new infections" baseline that you're claiming? How is the New Orleans plan different from the White House guidance?
I will say the home made masks can be much harder to breath through, especially when talking. Surgical style masks are far easier.
The phased approach using data trends is the method the White House has developed and is now encouraging - and I think many states, cities, and organizations using it to some degree.
I have needed to look at the White House plan to understand the re-opening plan for a large organization that I do legal work for . . . I have only been asked to spot (tort) liability concerns but I have reviewed the plans and they're based on (1) requiring case and test trends to hit certain metrics to get through the "gate" in to the next phase; (2) continued use of some mitigation measures - some in a sliding scale of impact - to protect the vulnerable groups that include the elderly and healthcare workers, and (3) monitoring the situation as a function of health-care capacity.
The New Orleans plan public website doesn't state the specific metrics (there probably is a more detailed plan that isn't on the site), but the White House plan includes, for example, that phase 1 cannot begin until there is a downward trajectory of documented cases within a 14-day period or a downward trajectory of positive tests as a percent of total tests within a 14-day period (flat or increasing volume of tests). And phase 1 is a limited opening, it's not a immediate return with a few casual measures still around.
I didn't watch her press conference but is that where you're getting the "zero new infections" baseline that you're claiming? How is the New Orleans plan different from the White House guidance?