BobE
Now with Covfefe
Offline
It's not that he was quicker. It's that his post is bigger and better.
Is that something to be ashamed of?
No, of course not.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not that he was quicker. It's that his post is bigger and better.
Is that something to be ashamed of?
She’s just trying to make you feel better.....No, of course not.
She’s just trying to make you feel better.....
I thought it was unusual that they weren't concerned about the food itself being handled or coughed on by someone who's infected. Am I being too paranoid or do you guys think that's a reasonable fear?
The article from the New England Journal does not say there is no risk. It says the risk is very low. It does not say it's impossible, it just says that it's highly unlikely.See post #13,720...…..superchuck posted a great article from the New England Journal of Medicine about this.......no need to be paranoid. Enjoy your food.
I get the criticism on the testing and the failure to lockdown travelers from Korea and Italy at a minimum - but is the idea that governors and mayors are somehow shielded from public health information? If there was so much clarity as you are saying there was then where is the criticism for Governors and Mayors who apparently ignored the threat until we are where we are.
I mean it seems weird that some rural county in Tennessee should be put in lockdown - which is why some sort of national response in that sense seems highly unusual to me. But the Governor of NY and the Mayor of NYC? If the goal here is to assign blame to politicians it seems like there is plenty to go around in terms of why certain places are where they are at.
yes, for the millionth time it is not the death rate, but how quickly it spreads. This virus is quickly overcoming available hospital beds.Isnt this the type of political discourse that is supposed to be being avoided?
yes, for the millionth time it is not the death rate, but how quickly it spreads. This virus is quickly overcoming available hospital beds.
How would you feel if a loved one was having a heart attack or involved in a bad car accident and had no available rooms to accommodate them. Politically speaking, both parties suck, that is all
The article from the New England Journal does not say there is no risk. It says the risk is very low. It does not say it's impossible, it just says that it's highly unlikely.
The reality is that even though the risk of getting infected from from food and store deliveries is low, it's not zero. There's still a chance it could happen. I personally don't want to tell someone "go ahead you'll be fine" and then find out they were the long shot that did get infected from it.
Even with my parents, one is mid 76 the other one is 81, I've just been making sure they understand all the different risks and then letting them decide what risks they want to take or not.
Safer does not mean completely safe. Not much risk does not mean no risk at all. Those are important distinctions to understand right now.