DT John Ridgeway III and a 7th round pick traded to the Saints for a 6th round pick (3 Viewers)

Ridgeway was drafted in the fifth round of the 2022 NFL Draft by the Dallas Cowboys where he joined current Washington coaches Dan Quinn and Joe Whitt Jr.

Washington claimed Ridgeway after the Cowboys waived him. He's since appeared in 32 games.

Looks like quality depth to me.
 
I don't get this. It's easy to say "Khalen Saunders injury replacement" but that's a lazy analysis to me. Saunders has a short term injury and we typically play only three defensive tackles a game anyway because people like Jordan can kick inside situationally. Maybe they don't think Boyd is ready to play. Maybe they're just loading up because they absolutely love him and he doesn't cost much. Who knows?
I think this is right to the extent it's not just about Saunders. They can get a NT off the street to be bottom rung backup NT for a few games. They are spending some draft capital for obvious reason that they think he could be developed into something. Our DT rotation including very old Cameron Jordan, who-knows Peyton Turner, and unproven Boyd makes it a sneaky place to develop a guy.
 
I don't get this. It's easy to say "Khalen Saunders injury replacement" but that's a lazy analysis to me. Saunders has a short term injury and we typically play only three defensive tackles a game anyway because people like Jordan can kick inside situationally. Maybe they don't think Boyd is ready to play. Maybe they're just loading up because they absolutely love him and he doesn't cost much. Who knows?
We will cut Vickers, and possibly Saunders. I heard he got pushed down the dpth chart, and isn't happy
 
We will cut Vickers, and possibly Saunders. I heard he got pushed down the dpth chart, and isn't happy
I've heard that too and that's the only other way this move could make sense. I don't understand though why we wouldn't just IR him since we can't cut an injured vet outright. Perhaps that's coming.

But even when we have carried a second nose on the 53, which isn't all the time, we typically make that guy a healthy scratch anyway. So why trade for one?
 
I've heard that too and that's the only other way this move could make sense. I don't understand though why we wouldn't just IR him since we can't cut an injured vet outright. Perhaps that's coming.

But even when we have carried a second nose on the 53, which isn't all the time, we typically make that guy a healthy scratch anyway. So why trade for one?

DA just trolling @Infoman. :grin:
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom