- Joined
- Jul 8, 2000
- Messages
- 27,679
- Reaction score
- 59,371
- Age
- 45
Online
That might not quite be a fair interpretation of this, but it's really close to putting him in the same category as Graham. It's certainly putting him in the same athletic category and he isn't even close to that:
"The things he can do athletically are nothing like anything we’ve had since Jimmy Graham. "
Look man, I don't want to fight about it. If you think Goedert is still a great TE, cool. I just don't think he's close to the player he was and at this point isn't much of an upgrade over Johnson and Moreau. I'll give you that he a better blocker than Johnson and a better receiver than Moreau, but the full package isn't a huge improvement over what we have other than that he's a complete TE.
And if it takes a big contract and draft picks to get him, I'd rather get Mayer, Engram, or take TEs in the draft. And again, if Philly is willing to let him go, it's a serious buyer beware situation. They know if he's still the player he was and if he's hitting the age cliff.
That being said, if he's released, comes relatively cheap, and Moore wants him, then I'm fine with signing him. But we also need to take a TE in the first 3 rounds of this draft.
Yes all that quote denotes is that of all the tight ends we have had since Jimmy, Goedert would be the most athletically gifted.
I thought I made that context very clear with the very next sentence where I indicated that I wasn’t comparing the two players.