Offline
Depends on how badly they wanted to play togetherA ridiculous and untenable proposed scenario.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Depends on how badly they wanted to play togetherA ridiculous and untenable proposed scenario.
It doesn't depend. It's just reckless fantasy.Depends on how badly they wanted to play togetherYou act like guys have never taken paycuts to play together before
That dude wasn't taking a pay cut. Sometimes people on here are delusional.
It’s called a proposed scenario, nobody said that it would happen.
To be fair, there was more chance of Carr taking a pay cut than Adams taking $10 million to play here. The Rams always made the most sense.
Carr was always highly unlikely to take a pay cut but the only reason he would have is if he actually though the Saints would cut him and he could not make up the money as a free agent. He was never going to cut his salary to sign Adams or any other player. Derek is always going to get his money.
This guy is overrated and getting old super fast. I would rather have Mike T.
He’s also pretty much past big pays without a significant playoff run - so he’d be a fool to not max out his big contract.Carr had no reason to take a pay cut with the escalating salaries of QBs. Carr's not the future, but he's the present while we work on the future. I'm cool with that.
Carr had no reason to take a pay cut with the escalating salaries of QBs. Carr's not the future, but he's the present while we work on the future. I'm cool with that.
I don't disagree. I think the Geno Smith trade and word that he was going to get a $40 to $45 million deal ended any chance of Carr taking a cut. Before that, at least you could say that Geno Smith, who is a good comp far Carr is only getting $25 million so if we cut you that is what you will get. But once Smith was traded and the price of his next contract was set, all that was over and the Saints lost what very little leverage they had.
As far as Carr, I'd have rathered go with Fields, Rattler, or a rookie to try to find The Guy, but I don't think going with Carr is a bad thing. It's a decision to try to be competitive this year which I'm fine with especially for a first year HC. My preference would be to start the search for a young QB this year and eat the cap hit this year, but I don't have a huge issue with keeping Carr for a year.
That might change if Loomis goes nuts in free agency and starts going all in with restructures for other players. But, I really don't think that is going to happen. I think he will sign 2 or 3 mid-level guys to fill holes and then some low priced guys, but nothing crazy.
Exactly, didn't Tom Brady get a few guys to follow him to Tampa and sign cap friendly deals? Including Gronk?Depends on how badly they wanted to play togetherYou act like guys have never taken paycuts to play together before