Offline
Last year we were saying 2026 was!Yep 2027 is the end game. Just keep kicking that can.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Last year we were saying 2026 was!Yep 2027 is the end game. Just keep kicking that can.
I keep reading that Carr is Quite but thinking back I don’t ever remember him being very vocal anyway. It’s never really been his style that I can remember.Yea I don’t remember them clearing space after whiffing on Watson. (Not disagreeing, I just don’t remember) Maybe it’s just a due diligence clearing for the following year. However, that doesn’t answer why DC4 is mouse quiet. I think it’s been said enough by many, Mike Detilier, NoF, that DC4 should’ve gotten the message loud and clear, but yet.,more silence. Maybe I’m making something out of nothing.
I get what you're saying and would agree except that Ross Jackson doesn't tend to be a sensationalist or clickbait-driven guy. He's an actual journalist by trade, so I give him a little more latitude when it comes to things like this.Not a surprise. At this point almost everyone putting out content about the Saints try to make almost everything a sign that the Saints are moving Carr this season. It's not going to end until Carr is on the team on the first day of training camp or the Saints move Carr, whichever comes first.
The Raiders benched him because Josh McDaniels didn’t want Carr and since he had an injury guarantee on his 2023 salary he decided to not let him play and take the chance of an injury. McDaniels is another DA. Good coordinator but bad head coach. Both failed twice as HC and likely will never get a third chance.Please correct me if I am wrong but I do not remember Carr ever being a male content! I remember him getting benched and then moved but I cannot recall if it was attitude related or play related.
Carr hs not done anything so far that tells me he has been the wrong. He refused a pay cut but let’s be honest in that his contract was a very good contract when we signed him. His cap is only as high due to Loomis restructuring it. Had it been left alone his cap would have been lower. Carr still earns a normal QB salary and is in the top 50% of QB’s playing. Many fans forget that restructure dollars drives up future caps but generally ends up being the same average over the length of the contract.
I think at this point he is the best option as a bridge QB. Younger guys can still learn a lot from him especially his mistakes or shortcomings.
Thanks for reminding me. I forgot it was mostly the coach and system.The Raiders benched him because Josh McDaniels didn’t want Carr and since he had an injury guarantee on his 2023 salary he decided to not let him play and take the chance of an injury. McDaniels is another DA. Good coordinator but bad head coach. Both failed twice as HC and likely will never get a third chance.
Last year we were saying 2026 was!
I've heard that when he's putting out content under the Locked On brand, he has to conform to their hype style and sensationalized titling. Compare how he is in a Locked On production versus how he is when he did training camp reports with Henderson.I get what you're saying and would agree except that Ross Jackson doesn't tend to be a sensationalist or clickbait-driven guy. He's an actual journalist by trade, so I give him a little more latitude when it comes to things like this.
Don't think we had any more to clear after Watson. I think we pretty much restructured everyone at that point.Yea I don’t remember them clearing space after whiffing on Watson. (Not disagreeing, I just don’t remember) Maybe it’s just a due diligence clearing for the following year. However, that doesn’t answer why DC4 is mouse quiet. I think it’s been said enough by many, Mike Detilier, NoF, that DC4 should’ve gotten the message loud and clear, but yet.,more silence. Maybe I’m making something out of nothing.
Who is we?Last year we were saying 2026 was!
That table does show the almost hidden constraints of our cap. We are second to last in actual cash spending for 2025, at $195m. Two teams neighboring us in cap space are spending around $50m more each, and they both have more restructuring capacity than we do should they decide to go that route.
Yea I don’t remember them clearing space after whiffing on Watson. (Not disagreeing, I just don’t remember) Maybe it’s just a due diligence clearing for the following year. However, that doesn’t answer why DC4 is mouse quiet. I think it’s been said enough by many, Mike Detilier, NoF, that DC4 should’ve gotten the message loud and clear, but yet.,more silence. Maybe I’m making something out of nothing.
That table does show the almost hidden constraints of our cap. We are second to last in actual cash spending for 2025, at $195m. Two teams neighboring us in cap space are spending around $50m more each, and they both have more restructuring capacity than we do should they decide to go that route.
More spending doesn't necessarily equal more wins, but the result of an all in strategy is the need to wind down spending for a few years to get back to normal. Still crazy that we went all in with DA. Cash spending ranks by year:
2022 - 5th
2023 - 9th
2024 - 23rd
2025 - 31st