Skip Bayless Accused of Paying Hair Dresser at FS1 $1.5 Mil to Have Sex With Him; Accuser Declined Offer (2 Viewers)

Only if you win. Lol.
I mean, frankly, I would rather "win" by not being sexually harassed in the first place.

Man, y'all have turned me into a feminist.
 
Why sleep with him for 1.5 when you can file a complaint and sue for much more? I would go to work at Fox everyday and hope someone harassed me!
Which is the exact playbook Joy Taylor was running with Charlie Dixon, according to the hairdresser.

1736408094647.png
If that can be proven true, a shame it isn't more more of a focus over Taylor's gold medal hoe-lympics performance.

Dixon's sleazy af, but she was prepared to lie on that man for something she was clearly doing very willingly with how much she was spreading it around the office.
 
This thread is $$$$$ - I think I’m laughing a bit too hard. :smilielol:

If this story is true, then kudos to her for standing her ground. Gives new meaning to “not even for a million dollars.”

Yeah seriously, talk about inflation.1.5 million is the new one million.

So what I’m learning here is that most straight men are gay for the right price.

Or the right prison.
 
Eh. He should get into politics. He could be President. Twice.
I won't dive too deep into this never-ending rabbit hole but suffice it to say, Skip Bay less lacks the charisma, charm, and saaviness to be anything close to above-referenced. Sometimes even in politics, their are special, unique cases like unicorns and everyone else is just an idiot wearing a stupid hat.
 
Ive heard said all sex is negotiation
Except in the "countercultural" late 60's/early 70's when it was mostly all free, and liberating and powerful somehow with the aegis of the "Sexual Revolution" baby beginning. It's a revolution thing, man.

What's interesting is that a few original Black Panthers had a negative, dismissive view of the whole "free love" hippy aesthetic. They werent prudish or puritanical mind you towards sex or even drugs its just neither looser morals regarding sex and drugs in of itself never freed enslaved or liberated opposed, subject minorities anywhere at any time in history. They cited accurately that the ancient Hellenistic Greco-Roman culture and society that was much more sexually daring, explicit, and erotic in its art, wall paintings, literature, decos in villas in Pompeii and Hercullaneam, didnt mean that the ancient Greeks or Romans were any less cruel, violent, harsh and punitative in conquering, subjugating and culturally assimilating surrounding national/cultural identities. That's why its always puzzled me when some people assume that a supposedly more open and free society regarding sexuality, expression, erotica and looser norms somehow equates to a more liberal, exclusive and tolerant world when history is full of examples where that simply not the case. Power Politics has never been so easily explainable or reductive in its reasoning or conclusions. In their last few decades of existence, quite a few Warsaw-Bloc Soviet-allied Eastern European nations became more tolerant, if not accepting of homosexuality or open public displays of homosexuality like East Germany and Yugoslavia. That still didn't mean that both countries weren't one-party, authoritian highly-centralized police states where Stasi informants, undercover officers, spies werent enmeshed within maybe 1/6th of all East Germans living in country and that both nations were fundamentally undemocratic societies. And Yugoslavia, by the early 80's after Tito's death, was a crumbling, failing Serbian ethno-state that couldn't keep centuries of past religious, cultural and ethnic sectarian rivalries under control anymore and would massively implode internally by the early 90's and make the city of Sarajevo hell on Earth throughout most of the 1990's.
 
Last edited:
So what I’m learning here is that most straight men are gay for the right price.
Not really, its just some are willing to lie and pretend for the right price for a lot of money many will never come to seeing even if they know their heterosexual.
 
$1.5 million will make people do weird things I'm sure.
Only if you win. Lol.
Considering we live in a postMeToo and #TimesUp world, I'd say those chances are far better then they were lets say 10-15 years ago. Granted, some of the sting and initial fear of being called out for past or possible transgressions mightve cooled down a bit since 2018-19, but we do indeed live in different times.
 
Considering we live in a postMeToo and #TimesUp world, I'd say those chances are far better then they were lets say 10-15 years ago. Granted, some of the sting and initial fear of being called out for past or possible transgressions mightve cooled down a bit since 2018-19, but we do indeed live in different times.
Nah - that was a blip - we’ve regressed back to toxic masculinity being over-looked/ explained away
 
Nah - that was a blip - we’ve regressed back to toxic masculinity being over-looked/ explained away
Is this toxic masculinity that happened with what certain celebs said or did 20-25 years ago and being held to account now or did most of it happen within the past 6-7 years. If it's the former, then there's a lot of crazy sheet that great legendary comedians like Carlin, Pryor, or even Eddie Murphy would be in deep trouble for now or be held under a microscope compared to their glory days from the 70's and 80's? Louis C.K. says hello, BTW. 1990's-early 2000's Carlin was mostly just a bitter, angry disaffected old man trying to reinvent himself by taking cues from Bill Hicks, Chris Rock and Sam Kinison, especially Hicks and Kinison.

The closest comedic analogy maybe to Carlin or Prior today is IMHO, Dave Chappelle and he's faced far more intense, polarizing scrutiny then those other two ever did in their heyday.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Users who are viewing this thread

    Back
    Top Bottom