Spencer Rattler’s first start was… (1 Viewer)

[SirLoinSaint64]

Impressive. Predictable. Exciting. Disappointing. The young man has what it takes.

 

[MikeyF]

I liked what I saw from Rattler overall. My only problem was where was the adjustment when Bowles starting blitzing him every possession from the last drive in the first half. That was inexcusable!!!!

That falls on our Kubiak...

 

[kwkrnu]

Overall it was awful. He put a few decent passes up, but if not for the turnovers and such at the end of the first half, that game ends up a lot more lopsided than it already was. Not all on Rattler, with no running game to speak of, and not enough protection during blitzes.....not sure why, though, they should have game planned around endless blitzes, given that TB brings pressure packages a LOT already, and a rookie QB? I'm shocked they didn't blitz every.single.down. Anyway....they should have been ready for it, and they weren't, and didn't make adjustments to keep in extra protection to help.

This team is lost...

 

[Poppy]

That's fair, though on at least two plays that appeared to be part of the play that was called because he did it immediately, which is a little head scratching to me.

The touchdown pass to Means, he back peddled from a clean pocket. Threw the ball back peddling and it wasnt necessary.

 

[meily]

 

[Vision]

I thought he did well given the talent around him. He couldn’t win the game on his own, but he didn’t lose it for us either.

I want to see more.

Rattler first game he finished with 60.7 rating. Williams at Chicago had a 55 his first start ,Nix had a 47.5 his first start and Daniel's had a 93. Those guys were starters in preseason I think I'm not sure.