Trade back into the 1st. (2 Viewers)

[2cmorgan]

Do you think it would be wise to try to trade back into the 1st round so we could get a elite OT and WR? Even if cost a 1st and another pick next year?

 

[Saint Kamara]

No no and no.

Do the opposite, if anything.

We need to get younger and cheaper, quick.

Our history of trading up is not great with a few exceptions (Kamara, McCoy).

 

[JvilleJoe]

Do you think it would be wise to try to trade back into the 1st round so we could get a elite OT and WR? Even if cost a 1st and another pick next year?

I would not do it as there are some quality WR's and OL who will be available in the 2nd. I would, however, if a player drops we really like at either position try to move up higher in the 2nd by giving up one of our 3rd round choices.

 

[SigFreudianSlip]

I hope not.

 

[whiteshadowen]

After we draft Corral earlier in the first round, I would be fine if we move back in if there is a WR, OL or even a RB that we feel is worth the move back in.

 

[SigFreudianSlip]

After we draft Corral earlier in the first round, I would be fine if we move back in if there is a WR, OL or even a RB that we feel is worth the move back in.

Please no RB in the first.

 

[BayouSAINTJoe]

No...you need the 2023 first just in case you need to grab a QB

 

[SAINTSFAN]

Do you think it would be wise to try to trade back into the 1st round so we could get a elite OT and WR? Even if cost a 1st and another pick next year?

How could anyone know whether it is a good idea before any selections have been made? It is completely dependent on what player or players are available.

 

[MV2]

With the amount of draft picks that don't usually make our roster I'm not worried about drafting 7 players. If we got 3-4 really good players I'd be happier with that.

 

[Eman5805]

No no and no.

Do the opposite, if anything.

We need to get younger and cheaper, quick.

Our history of trading up is not great with a few exceptions (Kamara, McCoy).

They won’t change. Why would you expect them to make a total 180 from how they’ve operated?

 

[Taker597]

No...you need the 2023 first just in case you need to grab a QB

Unless we go 1-15.... We aren't going to be in contention for rookie QB next year

 

[SigFreudianSlip]

They won’t change. Why would you expect them to make a total 180 from how they’ve operated?

I always figured it was Sean dictating the moves up. Guess we will find out….

 

[Stew 2.0]

If you do that you would have to go LT at 18 then come back for the WR

 

[BayouSAINTJoe]

Unless we go 1-15.... We aren't going to be in contention for rookie QB next year

Then we won't need a QB...but if we're a meandering 7-9 on the strength of lackluster QB play then we'd trade up using 2023's 1st and probably 24s 1st. But that's all dependent on if WInston stinks up the joint...which I don't think he will.

 

[i_am_error]

No no and no.

Do the opposite, if anything.

We need to get younger and cheaper, quick.

Our history of trading up is not great with a few exceptions (Kamara, McCoy).

Ingram was a trade back into the first.