REALCHRISM
Super Forum Fanatic
- Joined
- Sep 6, 1997
- Messages
- 9,298
- Reaction score
- 12
- Age
- 47
Offline
We need 1st round talent on defense. So no, I would be ****** off.
You know, I thought Mel Kiper, Jr., addressed this subject better than anyone during the "On the Clock" series for the Saints. He said, and I am paraphrasing, that there is this tendency to overrate getting a player on defense in the first round. You commit yourself to having to have a player on defense, which causes you to overthink the pick. You can take offense if necessary and still look to address the defense later in the draft.
Ultimately, what you want is value for your picks. We only have four as it currently stands. I would much rather us come away with at least three guys who could help us out than forcing picks on a particular side of the ball that might not pan out for us. This draft, while weak, does have some talent in the middle rounds at LB. I also think you can probably get a safety to develop in the middle rounds. So, I am more inclined to doing that if we have to do so than to saying we have to have a certain position on defense addressed in the first round and ending up with a bust.
Plus, unless you are getting a bona fide superstar at LB or S, my general belief is that those are guys who could be found later in the draft. My ideal draft would be to take Malcolm Jenkins. If he is not there, slide down a few spots, pick up a second or third and draft Wells. Then later on, you can look at a guy like Gerald McRath who I like as much as any of the first round backers not named Aaron Curry. Or you might look at the secondary with a guy like William Moore. I was disappointed in Moore's season last year but there is some belief that his poor showing was due to injury and the weight he gained. He has shown better in some of his off-season workouts and I do know the team likes him a lot.